Autism recovery or initial misdiagnosis?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Is Hard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Initial
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of autism recovery and the possibility of initial misdiagnosis, exploring personal anecdotes and varying perspectives on autism diagnoses, treatment, and the implications of labeling behaviors. The scope includes theoretical considerations, personal experiences, and societal observations regarding autism and its diagnosis.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about claims of "recovery" from autism, suggesting that improvements may reflect coping mechanisms rather than a true recovery.
  • Others propose that initial misdiagnosis could be a factor, emphasizing the importance of observing behavior over time to assess changes accurately.
  • A participant raises the idea that infectious agents could mimic autism symptoms, suggesting that therapy might help if the underlying issue is resolved.
  • Concerns are raised about the societal tendency to label behaviors, with some arguing that the increasing prevalence of autism diagnoses may reflect a cultural trend rather than an actual increase in cases.
  • Another participant notes that improvements in diagnostic techniques may account for the perceived rise in autism diagnoses, indicating that earlier detection could lead to more cases being identified.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of autism recovery, the validity of diagnoses, and the societal implications of labeling behaviors.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for missing assumptions about the nature of autism, the impact of environmental factors on child development, and the evolving understanding of autism diagnoses over time.

Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,663
Reaction score
36
Autism "recovery" or initial misdiagnosis?

This is a fascinating story, but I quite skeptical, even in light of high-functioning autistic people like Temple Grandin.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1169223&page=1

A Child Who 'Recovered' From Autism
After Two Years of Intensive Therapy, Jake Exkorn No Longer Exhibited Autism Symptoms


Sept. 29, 2005 — Jake Exkorn was progressing on schedule with other babies, learning words like "momma," "dada," pointing at objects that interested him, and clapping and imitating those around him.

But gradually, Jake stopped talking. He stopped learning. And, finally, he stopped interacting with his parents, Karen and Franklin. After an incident at his birthday party, the Exkorns could no longer deny there was a problem.
On his second birthday, Jake's friends were playing and laughing but Jake was nowhere to be found.

"All the kids were playing and laughing and he [Jake] was supposed to have his birthday cake," Karen Exkorn said. "I couldn't find him, and I went up and I found him lying facedown in the driveway."

Jake was diagnosed with pervasive developmental disorder, a form of autism. Autism is a collection of neurologically based developmental disorders that impair social interaction and communication skills and are associated with repetitive behaviors or interests, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The disorder affects one out of every 166 children and usually appears before the age of 3. The number of diagnosed cases is increasing, up to 17 percent a year.

"I thought that we had lost him forever," Exkorn said.

Yet, within two years of his diagnosis, Jake had "recovered" from autism.
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Well, I can't access the rest of the story because of my web tv, but several years ago I saw a similar claim made on a TV program. The kid in question was a teenager and the whole show was an interview with him, and his mother and father.

My impression was that he hadn't really "recovered" at all, just made some excellent strides in opening up to the world around him, and in discovering connections between things that had eluded him for most of his childhood. I've seen interviews with Temple Grandin, and I can't say this teen I saw was any more "recovered" than her.
 
Without meeting the kid in person and observing his behavior both when the diagnosis was first made and now, there's no way for me to know if he's really recovered or just learned to cope with his disease, or if there was an initial misdiagnosis. I've met Temple Grandin and she functions very well in public. If you didn't know she was autistic, you might just assume the few symptoms she still shows are just personality quirks. However, she is aware of her autism and knows that even though she can outwardly appear fairly normal, she doesn't feel all that normal. Things bother her that others wouldn't even notice, like a string caught on a fence and flapping in the wind.
 
There are a lot of infectious agents that are not yet recognized, and a viral infection that attacks the nervous system in a small child could mimic the symptoms of autism. A heavy therapy regimen, similar to reprogramming, could build a new reality construct for a kid like this, provided the infection had subsided.

The other thing is the relationship between the parent and the child. Children can be amazingly intelligent, and accidentally be given information that is devastating to the immature mind, that can not properly sort it out. So Mom is in the kitchen, and discusses with a friend that she really wishes she had not gotten pregnant with the child, and what a burden it is she felt like she was going to die when she found out. She thought having a second child, or child would kill her. Listening on the stairwell is a brilliant two year old, who decides he or she must die to save Mommy, but they don't know how, and neither can they verbalize that this is their plan. Hence they are found face down on the driveway on the occasion of their birthday.

All kinds of reflexive things happen, due to moments that seem innocuous to everyone else but the victim of them. Many parents seem to think it is enough to feed and clothe small kids and take them to daycare, and otherwise, they are on the phone, watching TV, working at home, or talking to other adults. I am amazed that there isn't more "out and out insanity" in small children left to their own devices in this video world.

It was different in the agrarian world, where there was the out of doors and the sensible progression of day to night, seasonal activity to seasonal activity. A child would see seed grow to berry, and seed grow to corn, and help their parents make a world. Now everything is occult, little children can't know about work and money and the absences of their parents, and their parent's level of distraction. I am not an advocate of stay at home mothering, I am an advocate of bi-parental commitment to the security, and intellectual development of children, in a safe environment populated for the most part, by family.

It is pretty clear that Autism is a serious situation, and once the initial genetic damage is done to cause it, it is genetically imparted to the next generation. It does not go away, however it can be mitigated by careful education, and environment.

Ergo, the kid in question here, was never autistic.
 
I think there is a lot more effort now to put labels on behavior than there was when I was growing up. The more we learn the more we can categorize and the more we will try to categorize, even if occasionally we ended up shoe-horning someone into a diagnosis. I think there is every possibility that happened here.
I might tick some people off by saying this, but the diagnosis of autism or Asperger's in children seems to have become almost fashionable in some places. I remember a person I work with talking about his two-year-old who had just been diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome. He said he figured it would happen. He blamed it on he and his wife being so intelligent - on their "geek genes". I assume this was vaguely influenced by articles like http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.12/aspergers_pr.html" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That article in Wired magazine got the attention of researchers who then followed up by studying if there really was an autism cluster. I don't have the references now (I could find them if needed), but no association was found. The apparent increase in incidence was attributed to improvements in diagnosing children earlier. It used to be difficult to diagnose Asperger's or Autism until children were missing developmental milestones in things like talking.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
21K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K