Why Macroscale Actions Don't Affect Atoms

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ph47f3
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the principle that macroscale actions, such as using a knife or detonating explosives, do not significantly affect atomic or subatomic structures. It highlights that while everyday actions can influence a few atoms, the energy required to alter atomic bonds is substantial. The energy from explosions dissipates rapidly, preventing the conditions necessary for nuclear reactions. The conversation emphasizes the strength of atomic bonds compared to the energy released in chemical explosions, confirming that nuclear explosions require specific conditions that are not met in typical scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic structure and bonding
  • Basic knowledge of energy dissipation principles
  • Familiarity with crystal structures and grain sizes in materials
  • Concepts of chemical versus nuclear reactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of atomic bonding and energy thresholds
  • Study the mechanics of energy dissipation in explosions
  • Explore the differences between chemical and nuclear reactions
  • Learn about crystal structures and their significance in material science
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, material scientists, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles governing atomic interactions and the effects of energy on materials.

Ph47f3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm not a studying physicist or anything else, but in my spare time I often sit and ponder the why and wherefore of things. Today's conundrum is: "Why don't massive or miniscule energy expenditures on the macroscale affect things on the atomic or subatomic scale."

Everyday I use a knife or run across a sidewalk. Why don't these actions cause atomic or subatomic changes? When demolitions companies explode mountains or buildings, they don't worry about inadvertently triggering a nuclear blast. What forces allow atoms to bang about so stressfully without breaking the internal bonds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The strength between atoms is quite large and to melt or vaporize a solid material requires enourmous quantities of energy.

Using a knife or walking over the sidewalk does affect some atoms, but so few that one would not be aware.

In many solids of metals or ceramics, atoms and molecules are arranged in order crystal structures, although under special considitions, and amorphous (non-crystalline) structure may exist (e.g. glass). The crystals are arranged in grains, and the grain sizes are on the order of microns (10-6 m).

Even the grains are strongly connected by the bonds between atoms on their surfaces. When an explosive detonates the energy may brake the weakest bonds, so materials break in pieces consisting of many grains.

Now in an explosion, the solid materials closest to the explosion may indeed vaporize and melt. However, the energy of the explosion rapidly dissipated according to roughly 1/r3, so as the explosion progresses, the energy density drops dramatically, and so the local energy quickly drops below the levels required to vaporize or melt, but instead the adhesion between grain surfaces is disrupted.

Nuclear explosion require very special conditions, which promote the fissioning of particular atoms. The nuclear forces holding the nucleus together are much, much stronger than the chemical forces hold atoms together, so a chemical explosion will not cause a nuclear explosion.