zoobyshoe
- 6,514
- 1,255
On my browser, faster posts now have less length on the x-axis, <---->. Is this the same in your inertial frame?
The discussion revolves around the observation of relativistic effects in the context of forum posts, particularly focusing on the perceived changes in post length and width as they relate to posting speed and content. Participants explore the implications of these observations, touching on concepts of length contraction and other relativistic phenomena, while also engaging in light-hearted banter about the forum's features.
Participants express a mix of agreement and confusion regarding the observations of post length and width, with no clear consensus on the implications of these observations or their relation to relativistic effects. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views and interpretations present.
There are limitations in the assumptions made about the effects of posting speed on post length, and the discussion does not resolve the mathematical or physical principles behind the observations. The playful nature of the conversation may obscure the technical aspects being referenced.
zoobyshoe said:On my browser, faster posts now have less length on the x-axis, <---->. Is this the same in your inertial frame?
I don't know. My posts have been smiley-free since 2003. I'm a member of Smilies Anonymous.wolram said:I am not sure about that, but i have no colour or size and my smilies have to
be draged and droped, or am i missing some trick ?
zoobyshoe said:I don't know. My posts have been smiley-free since 2003. I'm a member of Smilies Anonymous.
I conquored booze 25 years ago. That's why I have the stamina to resist smilies today.wolram said:I am sitting here with a huge bag of M&Ms a substitute for rum and coke.
You can try sorting them in alphabetical order.wolram said:I am sitting here with a huge bag of M&Ms a substitute for rum and coke.
jimmysnyder said:You can try sorting them in alphabetical order.
I prefer timely dilations, but that's just me, I guess.El Hombre Invisible said:Do I have to mention lengthy contractions?
On my screen, your post, for instance, is half an inch wider than pattylou's just above you. Each post is a different width depending on how many words there are in it. As I scroll down a thread I can see all the different posts changing widths from one to the next.Moonbear said:I don't even know what you guys are talking about here?Maybe the upgrade only works best on Macs, so you all have to switch to Mac!
![]()
![]()
It's TWINS! How paradoxical!arildno said:I prefer timely dilations, but that's just me, I guess.
That's what is so strange.El Hombre Invisible said:It's TWINS! How paradoxical!
All I know is that it leads to a mass increase.arildno said:That's what is so strange.
I can see that GIRTH contraction is complementary to some timely dilation, but contraction of LENGTH??
I'll never understand relativity..![]()
No, I didn't.El Hombre Invisible said:All I know is that it leads to a mass increase.
You remembered you password then.
Flirtation Alert![/color][/size]arildno said:No, I didn't.
Mass increase?
How exciting..
zoobyshoe said:On my screen, your post, for instance, is half an inch wider than pattylou's just above you. Each post is a different width depending on how many words there are in it. As I scroll down a thread I can see all the different posts changing widths from one to the next.
wolram said:Well i measured mine and it stays at 260mm,.
I was still on about childbirth. In two respects it's very exciting indeed.arildno said:Mass increase?
How exciting..