Thread Closed

Need help getting started!

 
Share Thread
Oct12-05, 03:27 PM   #1
 

Need help getting started!


Hello
Im trying to prove that a function h: R^n -> R^m is differentialbe if and only if each of the m components hi: R^n -> R is differentiable.
I know that i have to use the coordinate projection function and the chain rule for one implication, but im having lots of trouble starting the problem off.
thanks
A.P.
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> City-life changes blackbird personalities, study shows
>> Origins of 'The Hoff' crab revealed (w/ Video)
>> Older males make better fathers: Mature male beetles work harder, care less about female infidelity
Oct12-05, 04:18 PM   #2
 
.............................
Oct12-05, 04:51 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Homework Helper Homework Help
Science Advisor Science Advisor
If all components are differentiable then my guess is that you can use the triangle inequality to show that the function itself is dif'able.

For the only if part, you could assume that one of the components is not differentiable while the function is dif'able and hopefully a contradiction will be obvious.
Oct12-05, 05:21 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus

Need help getting started!


Exactly what is your definition of "differentiable"?
Oct12-05, 06:01 PM   #5
 
Ok i used the triangle inequality to show that the function itself is differentiable; my work looks like
assume (h1, h2, ...... , hm) is differentiable
therefore by the triangle inequality,
= ||(h1 .... hm)(x) - (h1.....hm)(Xo) - D(h1.....hm)(Xo)(x-Xo)||/ ||x-Xo||
and since h= (h1,h2, ....., hm)
then
||h(x) - h(Xo) - Dh(Xo)(x-Xo)|| / ||x-Xo||

now my proof was that the function is differentiable if and only if each component is differentiable.
and i assumed that one component was not differentable where the entire fn was differentiable. To hopefully find that it is a contradiction.
my work looks like: assume hj is not differentiable

since h= (hi,h2,..hj...,hm)
= ||(hi,...hj....hm)(x) - (hi,....hj,....,hm)(Xo) - D(hi,...hj,...,hm)(Xo)(x-Xo)||
/ ||x-Xo||

and i went on to say that this is
<= || hi(x) - hi(Xo) - Dhi(x-Xo) + ....+ hj(x) - hj(Xo) - Dhj(x-Xo) +....
but i assumed hj was not differentiable
therefor this is a contradiction, therefor if h is differentiable
then the,
sum (i=1 to m) hi must be differentiable


is this a good proof showing that all components are differentiable.. or am i doing somthing wrong?
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Need help getting started!
Thread Forum Replies
Could someone get me started Introductory Physics Homework 3
Need some help getting started.. Introductory Physics Homework 2
Can't get started Introductory Physics Homework 1
Can't Get Started. Please Help! Introductory Physics Homework 9
Getting Started Electrical Engineering 1