Register to reply

Need help getting started!

by Pearce_09
Tags: started
Share this thread:
Pearce_09
#1
Oct12-05, 03:27 PM
P: 74
Hello
Im trying to prove that a function h: R^n -> R^m is differentialbe if and only if each of the m components hi: R^n -> R is differentiable.
I know that i have to use the coordinate projection function and the chain rule for one implication, but im having lots of trouble starting the problem off.
thanks
A.P.
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Hoverbike drone project for air transport takes off
Earlier Stone Age artifacts found in Northern Cape of South Africa
Study reveals new characteristics of complex oxide surfaces
Pearce_09
#2
Oct12-05, 04:18 PM
P: 74
.............................
EnumaElish
#3
Oct12-05, 04:51 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
EnumaElish's Avatar
P: 2,482
If all components are differentiable then my guess is that you can use the triangle inequality to show that the function itself is dif'able.

For the only if part, you could assume that one of the components is not differentiable while the function is dif'able and hopefully a contradiction will be obvious.

HallsofIvy
#4
Oct12-05, 05:21 PM
Math
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 39,317
Need help getting started!

Exactly what is your definition of "differentiable"?
Pearce_09
#5
Oct12-05, 06:01 PM
P: 74
Ok i used the triangle inequality to show that the function itself is differentiable; my work looks like
assume (h1, h2, ...... , hm) is differentiable
therefore by the triangle inequality,
= ||(h1 .... hm)(x) - (h1.....hm)(Xo) - D(h1.....hm)(Xo)(x-Xo)||/ ||x-Xo||
and since h= (h1,h2, ....., hm)
then
||h(x) - h(Xo) - Dh(Xo)(x-Xo)|| / ||x-Xo||

now my proof was that the function is differentiable if and only if each component is differentiable.
and i assumed that one component was not differentable where the entire fn was differentiable. To hopefully find that it is a contradiction.
my work looks like: assume hj is not differentiable

since h= (hi,h2,..hj...,hm)
= ||(hi,...hj....hm)(x) - (hi,....hj,....,hm)(Xo) - D(hi,...hj,...,hm)(Xo)(x-Xo)||
/ ||x-Xo||

and i went on to say that this is
<= || hi(x) - hi(Xo) - Dhi(x-Xo) + ....+ hj(x) - hj(Xo) - Dhj(x-Xo) +....
but i assumed hj was not differentiable
therefor this is a contradiction, therefor if h is differentiable
then the,
sum (i=1 to m) hi must be differentiable


is this a good proof showing that all components are differentiable.. or am i doing somthing wrong?


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Could someone get me started Introductory Physics Homework 3
Need some help getting started.. Introductory Physics Homework 2
Can't get started Introductory Physics Homework 1
Can't Get Started. Introductory Physics Homework 9
Getting Started Electrical Engineering 1