Finding a Basis for O.D.Es with Same Roots

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods for finding a basis for ordinary differential equations (O.D.Es) that have repeated roots. Participants explore the implications of having the same roots and the necessity of obtaining linearly independent solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that adding a factor of x or x^2 to the solutions is necessary to ensure linear independence when roots are repeated.
  • Others argue that multiplying by a variable ensures the solutions are not scalar multiples of each other, which is required for linear independence.
  • One participant mentions the Wronskian determinant, stating that if it equals zero, the solutions are linearly dependent, thus emphasizing the need for non-zero Wronskian.
  • A question is raised about the choice of x or x^2, with a suggestion that other functions like xy, x^y, or e^x could also be used.
  • Another participant suggests that while other functions could be used, it may complicate the problem unnecessarily.
  • A mathematical approach is introduced involving a differential operator and a modified equation, with a suggestion to solve it under specific initial conditions and then take a limit to understand the basis functions better.
  • A request for clarification on the mathematical explanation is made, indicating some participants seek further understanding of the proposed method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the choice of functions to multiply for obtaining a basis. While there is agreement on the need for linear independence, the specific methods and functions to achieve this remain contested.

Contextual Notes

Some mathematical steps and assumptions are not fully elaborated, particularly regarding the initial conditions and the limit process mentioned in the proposed solution. The discussion does not resolve these aspects.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in differential equations, particularly those studying the implications of repeated roots and methods for finding linearly independent solutions, may find this discussion relevant.

asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
why is it that when you have the same roots to an O.D.E., you usually add an x or x^2 to get a basis?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
because when you multipy anything by a variable it will not be a scaler multiple of the original, and you need two unique so;utions (or more) for an ode
 
Because if Wronskian=0 then you have linearly dependent solutions, and you need linearly independent solutions (i.e. W not equal 0).
 
but why pick x or x^2 to multiply? why not something like xy or x^y or e^x or something?
 
you could but why make it more complicated than you have to
 
Let D be a differential operator such that a is a double root:

[tex](D-a)^2 y = 0[/itex]<br /> <br /> Consider the slightly modified DE:<br /> <br /> [tex](D-a + \epsilon)(D-a-\epsilon)[/tex]<br /> <br /> Solve this second equation subject to the initial conditions [itex]y(0) = y_0[/itex] and [itex]\dot y(0) = \dot y_0[/itex] then pass to the limit of [itex]\epsilon[/itex] going to zero. You'll find the answer to your question in the result! :)[/tex]
 
Tide said:
Solve this second equation subject to the initial conditions [itex]y(0) = y_0[/itex] and [itex]\dot y(0) = \dot y_0[/itex] then pass to the limit of [itex]\epsilon[/itex] going to zero. You'll find the answer to your question in the result! :)
:bugeye:
could you explain that part a little clearer?
 
This ODE

[tex]\left( \frac {d^2}{dt^2} - 2 a \frac {d}{dt} + a^2 - \epsilon ^2 \right) y= 0[/tex]

has repeated roots when [itex]\epsilon \rightarrow 0[/itex]. Solve the equation as it is subject to specific initial conditions. When you're all done, pass to the limit [itex]\epsilon \rightarrow 0[/itex] and you'll see why the basis functions are the way they are when you have repeated roots! (Sorry - I don't have the time to type in the algebra but it is straightforward.)
 
thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K