Old Book Review - Classical Charged Particles

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around the book "Classical Charged Particles" by Fritz Rohrlich, published in 1965. The reviewer praises the book for its exceptional treatment of the philosophy and logic of physical theory, as well as its thorough explanations of special and general relativity. Notably, the book addresses the equivalence principle's validity for charged particles, a topic rarely covered in other texts. The reviewer highly recommends this book for its insightful content and clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special and general relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with the philosophy of science and physical theories
  • Knowledge of charged particles in gravitational fields
  • Basic comprehension of the equivalence principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Classical Charged Particles" by Fritz Rohrlich
  • Explore the equivalence principle in the context of charged particles
  • Study the philosophy of physical theories in relation to modern physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in special and general relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the philosophical foundations of physical theories and the behavior of charged particles in gravitational fields.

pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
Old Book Review - "Classical Charged Particles"

Hi folks

I've picked up a rather old book. It was written back in 1965 by Fritz Rohrlich and is called "Classical Charged Particles". I found this book by a reference in Jackson's EM text. I have to say that this is a superb book! I don't think I've read anything as good as this book before. The first chapter is called Philosophy and Logic of Physical Theory. Excellant chapter on what science and physics is and the nature of what it means to be a "Law
of Physics" and what it means for something to be a "Theory".

This text is quite excellant regarding special and general relativity as well. The nice thing is that it explains GR and what a gravitational field is (e.g. what is the "strength" of the field etc) as I've tried to explain it here in the past. I disagree with the author's opinions in a few places but that doesn't mean this isn't a superb text. I highly recommend reading this book! You won't regret it!

Pete
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One nice thing about this book is that it addresses a complex question that is sometimes asked in this forum. The question has to do with charged particles in a g-field. The section is called Is the Principle of Equivalence Principle Valid for Charged Particles? I know of no other text which addresses this point.

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K