Product of Uniformly Continuous Functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Uniform continuity of the product of two uniformly continuous functions h and g on the interval I, where both functions are bounded, is established. The proof demonstrates that if the product function f(x) = h(x)g(x) is continuous but not uniformly continuous, it leads to a contradiction using the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem. The argument shows that the assumption of non-uniform continuity fails, confirming that hg is uniformly continuous on I. The boundedness of h and g is crucial for the proof's validity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of uniformly continuous functions
  • Familiarity with the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
  • Knowledge of continuity and boundedness in real analysis
  • Experience with limits and sequences in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of uniformly continuous functions in detail
  • Learn about the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem and its applications
  • Explore the implications of bounded functions in real analysis
  • Investigate direct proofs of uniform continuity for products of functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions and their products.

Icebreaker
"Let [tex]h[/tex] and [tex]g[/tex] be uniformly continuous on [tex]I\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex] and are both bounded. Show that [tex]hg[/tex] is uniformly continuous."

h and g are uniformly continuous and bounded on I implies that h and g are continuous and bounded on I. This implies that hg (h times g) is continuous and bounded on I. Let f(x) = h(x)g(x).

Assume that f is continuous on I but not uniformly, then there exists e>0 such that for all d>0, there exists x and y in I such that |x-y|<d and |f(y)-f(x)|>e. In particular, for every n>0, there exists x_n and y_n in I such that |y_n - x_n|<1/n and |f(y_n)-f(x_n)|>e. Since {x_n} is a sequence in I, by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem, there exists a subsequence x_n_p converging to z in I. As y_n_p = x_n_p + (y_n_p - x_n_p) for every n, and {y_n_p - x_n_p} converges to 0, {y_n_p} also converges to z. Since f is continuous at z, {f(y_n_p)-f(x_n_p)} converges to f(z)-f(z) = 0. This contradicts the assumption that |f(y_n_p)-f(x_n_p)|>e for all n. Hence, f must be uniformly continuous on I.

Does anyone see any flaws in that argument? I did it without referring to the fact that h and g are both bounded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can prove this "directly" from the definition. This will be a useful identity:

|f(x)g(x) - f(y)g(y)| = |f(x)g(x) - f(x)g(y) + f(x)g(y) - f(y)g(y)|.

The problem with your proof is this:

Since {x_n} is a sequence in I, by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem...

You assume that I is bounded (and later you assume that it's closed too). Which you really can't.
 
Last edited:
Darn it. I thought something was amiss. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
3K