Using Partial Fractions to Simplify Summations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Natasha1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of partial fractions to simplify the summation of the series involving the expression 1/(4k^2 - 1). Participants are exploring the application of this technique to express the sum in a specific form.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the correctness of the partial fraction decomposition and its application to the summation. There are questions about the interpretation of the summation and the notation used, particularly regarding the expression of the sum and the variable 'n'. Some participants express confusion about the connection to sequences and series.

Discussion Status

There is a mix of attempts to clarify the problem and explore the implications of the partial fraction decomposition. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the summation, while others are still seeking clarity on the overall question and its requirements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with notation and understanding of the problem setup, indicating potential gaps in information or assumptions that need to be addressed. There is also mention of the need for clarity in the expression of mathematical terms.

Natasha1
Messages
494
Reaction score
9
I don't know how the latex coding works sorry...

I have to use the partial fraction technique on 1/(4k^2 - 1)...
So far so good and I get 1 / 2(2k-1) - 1 / 2(2k+1), is this correct?


I now need to show that if E is the sum of terms where k=1 and n is the unknow.

E 1 / 4k^2 - 1 = n / 2n + 1

Please help :cry:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, notice: 4k^2 - 1 = (2k-1)(2k+1)

I don't understand the second part, it makes no sense. If it was asking for the value of 'n' it would make sense. There's no reason to ask whether E can be expressed in that form when k = 1, I can't see why a teacher would want to ask it.

Also, what does this have to do with sequences/series?

Edit: I see about the sigma notation now, totally misunderstood the question the first time, don't know how to solve it though.
 
Last edited:
Natasha1 said:
I don't know how the latex coding works sorry...
I have to use the partial fraction technique on 1/(4k^2 - 1)...
So far so good and I get 1 / 2(2k-1) - 1 / 2(2k+1), is this correct?
I now need to show that if E is the sum of terms where k=1 and n is the unknow.
E 1 / 4k^2 - 1 = n / 2n + 1
Please help :cry:
[tex]\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}[/tex]
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 [tex]\frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}[/tex]
k= 2 [tex]\frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}[/tex]
k= 3 [tex]\frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}[/tex]
k= 4 [tex]\frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}[/tex]
Do you see what happens when you add those?
 
HallsofIvy said:
[tex]\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}[/tex]
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 [tex]\frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}[/tex]
k= 2 [tex]\frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}[/tex]
k= 3 [tex]\frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}[/tex]
k= 4 [tex]\frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}[/tex]
Do you see what happens when you add those?


Yes thanks I have now completed the exercise :-). Thanks!
 
HallsofIvy said:
[tex]\Sigma_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{4k^2-1}= \frac{n}{2n+1}[/tex]
Is that what you mean? Even if you can't use latex, please use parentheses! Most people would read 1/4k^2-1 as (1/4)k^2- 1 or 1/(4k^2)- 1 rather than 1/(4k^2-1).
Yes, your partial fraction decomposition is correct. To see how it applies to the sum, write out a few of the terms using that decomposition:
doing, say k= 1 to 4:
k= 1 [tex]\frac{1}{4-1}= \frac{1}{2}- \frac{1}{6}[/tex]
k= 2 [tex]\frac{1}{16-1}= \frac{1}{6}- \frac{1}{10}[/tex]
k= 3 [tex]\frac{1}{36-1}= \frac{1}{10}- \frac{1}{14}[/tex]
k= 4 [tex]\frac{1}{63}= \frac{1}{14}- \frac{1}{18}[/tex]
Do you see what happens when you add those?

Exercise done thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K