.Understanding Torque: Forces, Rotation, and Equilibrium

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of torque, particularly in the context of forces acting on an object in translational equilibrium. Participants explore the relationship between forces, rotation, and the conditions under which torque is defined, questioning the validity of the torque formula and its application to various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of applying two equal and opposite forces on an object, questioning how torque is calculated and its dependence on the location of the rotation axis. They raise inquiries about whether multiple forces can be represented as a couple and the conditions under which this is valid.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants seeking clarification on the nature of torque and its application. Some have provided insights into the concept of couples and the conditions for static equilibrium, while others continue to express confusion about specific scenarios and the implications of their questions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and assumptions surrounding torque, particularly in relation to objects without a clear rotation axis, such as a book. There is a focus on understanding how forces interact and the conditions under which they can be simplified into couples.

beginner16
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
hi

If two equal forces in oposite direction act on an object in translational equilibrium it will just rotate and continue to be in translational equilibrium.No matter where on the body two forces are applied?

As simple as possible please: How did we come up with
torque= F * distance_between_two _forces

Can you tell me why formula is correct no matter where the rotation axis is located?
What if body has no rotation axis,if it is just your regular book or something like that?


Could these two forces actually represent the sum of many forces applied on multiple points on the body,or must there be only two forces?

thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you prove it?

Start with a rigid solid and put two forces with same magnitude but opposite directions, then calculate the moment of each force at a point O and add them.
 
prove what?There are 5 questions I asked,and in any case I'm not shure I know what you are talking about
 
Use this drawing to "proof" the formula.
 
Last edited:
I did proof but still have two questions

M=F( r1*sin(a) + r2*sin(b) )=F*d

d=F*r1*sin(a) + r2*sin(b)

What if body has no rotation axis,if it is just your regular book or something like that?Could these two forces actually represent the sum of many forces applied on multiple points on the body,or must there be only two forces?
 
What if body has no rotation axis,if it is just your regular book or something like that?

What do you mean? could you provide an example?

Could these two forces actually represent the sum of many forces applied on multiple points on the body,or must there be only two forces?

There can be many forces acting on solid body, this is just an special case, where you can rewrite them as a couple or as those forces, it depends on the case. Also, the concept of couple it's important in order to develop the statically equivalent relations, all systems in equilibrium can be reduced to a resultant force and resultant couple, etc..
 
Cyclovenom said:
What do you mean? could you provide an example?

Well if the two forces are applied on a book around what would the book rotate.Around its center of mass or does it depend on where on the body the two forces are applied.If it would rotate around center of mass...why?

There can be many forces acting on solid body, this is just an special case, where you can rewrite them as a couple or as those forces, it depends on the case. Also, the concept of couple it's important in order to develop the statically equivalent relations, all systems in equilibrium can be reduced to a resultant force and resultant couple, etc..

But if those two forces are infact net forces,then how do you decide where the point of contact will be since depending on point of contact between a body and a force,the torque between force couples could vary?
 
Well if the two forces are applied on a book around what would the book rotate.Around its center of mass or does it depend on where on the body the two forces are applied.If it would rotate around center of mass...why?

It' will rotate around any axis that is perpendicular to the plane the two forces are in. This is because the moment about any point for a couple it's the same.

But if those two forces are infact net forces,then how do you decide where the point of contact will be since depending on point of contact between a body and a force,the torque between force couples could vary?

What do you mean? Couples are free vectors, they can be put anywhere on the solid body.
What i was saying is if you consider Varignon's Theorem, and if you have a finite numer of vector forces concurrent to one point and then another set of vector forces concurrent to another point, and if you calculate the resultant force of each of both sets, and the resultant force of each set has the same magnitude, but opposite direction (thus being in the same plane), then you indeed can form a couple out of these two set of forces.
 
I was thinking a little more about your question, yes a Couple could be the statically equivalent system for a system of many forces acting in different points, coplanar o not.
 
  • #10
Cyclovenom said:
It' will rotate around any axis that is perpendicular to the plane the two forces are in. This is because the moment about any point for a couple it's the same.

But what axis will it rotate around if the object in question is a book?Or a shoe...
 
  • #11
It depends, but for most engineering puposes we care about the centroidal axis.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K