Mohr-Coulomb Theory: Overview & Explanation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the Mohr-Coulomb theory, particularly its application in the context of frictional plasticity in materials such as soil and rock. Participants explore the theory's implications for constitutive modeling and its limitations compared to other yield criteria.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the Mohr-Coulomb theory and its specifics.
  • Another participant suggests that the inquiry may relate to frictional plasticity theory.
  • A third participant elaborates on the need to incorporate frictional and dilatational effects in the constitutive modeling of materials like soil and rock.
  • This participant argues that standard J2 - von Mises yield criteria do not adequately account for these effects, leading to poor results in modeling plastic deformation.
  • The Mohr-Coulomb yield condition is described as dependent on a combination of shear stress and mean normal stress, with a specific equation provided: τ = c - μσ.
  • The participant notes that the yield criterion has a wedge-shaped cross-section, which contrasts with the standard von Mises model that lacks this dependency.
  • A related model, the Drucker-Prager model, is mentioned as having a similar yield surface shape and is often preferred in numerical work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the Mohr-Coulomb theory, with some agreeing on its relevance to frictional plasticity while others highlight its limitations compared to alternative models. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to modeling these materials.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in standard yield criteria when applied to pressure-sensitive materials, emphasizing the need for models that incorporate frictional effects. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical complexities involved in these models.

Mk
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
4
What is the Mohr-Coulomb theory? Can you tell me a bit about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you referring to the frictional plasticity theory ?
 
I think so, yes.
 
About the model in general ... if you've some specifics in mind "shoot"...

For materials like soil, rock etc. frictional and dilatational effects need to be incorporated in the constitutive modeling (think about deformation of concrete intuitively as an example, the role of friction in the plasticity response is somewhat easy to "visualize"). Standard J2 - von Mises type of yield criterion & flow rule & evolution equation don't generally produce decent results when applied to such materials, when they neglect both frictional and pressure sensitive (dilatational) effects to plastic deformation.

So, in order to get rid of this handicap pressure dependent material models for plasticity have been developed. The yielding conditions for example have frictional resistance term(s), in the Mohr-Coulomb case the yield condition states that yielding occurs when a critical combination of shear stress and mean normal stress are reached on any plane, the criterion written as - for the magnitude of the shear stress for yield
[tex] \tau=c-\mu\sigma[/tex]
[itex]\sigma[/itex] is the normal stress on a plane, c is the cohesion shear stress, and the "coefficient of internal friction" is defined via an angle of internal friction (-> next sentence). Essentially you can understand the yield criterion being wedge shaped (its cross-section) with an angle identified with the friction coefficient (when viewed in a plane) as a function of mean normal stress (a dependency standard von Mises for example doesn't have). A related, and a "better behaving" model is the Drucker-Prager model (similar analogy in the shape of the yield surface as between Tresca and von Mises models) - which for this reason have usually used in numerical work.

A pretty 'solid' presentation:
http://www.granular-volcano-group.org/frictional_theory.html#II .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K