Proving Vector Equality without Dot Product - A Simple Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter square_imp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the equality of the lengths of four position vectors a, b, c, and d relative to point O, given that the lines from O to the midpoints of segments AB, BC, and CD are perpendicular to those segments. The conclusion reached is that while the dot product can demonstrate that the lengths of vectors a and b are equal (|a| = |b|), it does not prove that the vectors themselves are equal. The notation a² refers to the square of the modulus of vector a, confirming that the proof is about vector lengths rather than vector equality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the concept of vector length (modulus)
  • Knowledge of the dot product and its properties
  • Basic principles of geometry related to perpendicular lines
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of vector lengths and their implications in geometry
  • Learn about vector projections and their applications in proving relationships between vectors
  • Study the concept of orthogonality in vector spaces
  • Investigate alternative methods for proving vector relationships without using the dot product
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in vector analysis and geometric proofs.

square_imp
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Now on another question, that states four points in space have 4 position vectors a,b,c and d relative to O. The question tells you that the line O to the mid-point of AB, BC and CD is perpendicular to the lines AB, BC and CD respectively. The question is asking for me to prove that therefore a^2 = b^2 = c^2 = d^2. Now I have used that fact that the dot product of the perpendicular lines = 0 which ends up proving that the coefficients of the vectors a and b for example equal each other. But is this proof that the actual vectors equal each other? Is there a better way of doing it without using the dot product? Hope I have explained this well enough.Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just to clarify, I substituted a = xi + yj + zk and b = ui + vj + wk and proved that x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = u^2 + v^2 + w^2. Is this proof that therefore a^2 = b^2?
 
square_imp said:
Just to clarify, I substituted a = xi + yj + zk and b = ui + vj + wk and proved that x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = u^2 + v^2 + w^2. Is this proof that therefore a^2 = b^2?
What you have shown is that a and b have the same length.

i.e. |a| = |b| or √{(xi)² + (yj)² + (zk)²} = √{(ui)² + (vj)² + (wk)²}

That was all you were being asked to prove. Not that the vectors were equal to each other.
When the question used a², I think that meant the square of the modulus, or length, of the vector a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
6K