Finding the matrix transformation of T

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the matrix representation of linear transformations in the context of vector spaces, specifically R². Participants are examining examples from a textbook that illustrate how to derive the matrix A corresponding to a transformation T applied to a vector v.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the derivation of matrix A from the transformation equations provided in the textbook. There is confusion regarding the arrangement of coefficients in the matrices and whether different transformations yield the same matrix representation. Some participants are exploring how to compute Av for different matrices to verify their correctness.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on the process of finding matrix representations of linear transformations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between transformations and their matrix representations, but no consensus has been reached on the specific examples discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with specific examples from a textbook and are grappling with the definitions and properties of linear transformations. There is mention of a desire for additional resources or tutorials to aid in understanding the concepts discussed.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Ookay i don't understand this at all...Sorry i forgot how to use LaTex to form matrices so bare with me...
There is an example in the book that has:
v =
x
y


T[v] =
5x-y
4x - 5/2y

so, they said thus,
T[v] =
5 -1
4 -5/2
*
x
y

so they say:
A =
5 -1
4 -5/2

of T

which makes sense, but in the book first question:
T(v) =
3x -y
2y +x

A =
3 -1
1 2

what the heck? why isn't it
3 -1
2 1

Also there was another one:
T(v) =
y-x
x+y

A =
-1 1
1 1

why isn't it just
A =
1 -1
1 1
?

why did they switch the x and y? and in the example they didn't do anyhting different. :bugeye:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's look at

[tex] T(v) = \left( \begin{array}{c}3x - y \\ 2y + x \end{array} \right)[/tex]

in particular. You're trying to find a matrix A such that T(v) = Av.

The book winds up with the matrix:

[tex] A = \left( \begin{array}{cc}3 & -1 \\ 1 & 2\end{array} \right)[/tex]

while you think it should be

[tex] A = \left( \begin{array}{cc}3 & -1 \\ 2 & 1\end{array} \right)[/tex]

Right?

Well, have you tried computing Av for each of these matrices? Are either of them equal to T(v)?


Incidentally, do you think that the following S and T are the same linear transformation?

[tex] T\left( \begin{array}{cc}x \\ y\end{array} \right)<br /> = \left( \begin{array}{c}3x - y \\ 2y + x}\end{array} \right)[/tex]

[tex] S\left( \begin{array}{cc}x \\ y\end{array} \right)<br /> = \left( \begin{array}{c}3x - y \\ x + 2y}\end{array} \right)[/tex]
 
thanks for the responce, but I'm so lost, the example in the book just shows how you can find A if you are given: T(i), w, and T(w), i tried to go in reverse and it isn't working out right! Do you know if you can explain to me how you find the Av of each matrix? Or is there somthing online? I searched and couldn't find any good tutorial. I understand how to do these problems which say: assume that T: R^2->R^2 is a linear transformation use the information to determine T[x y]^T for all [x y]^T and find the matrix of T:
http://show.imagehosting.us/show/898600/0/nouser_898/T0_-1_898600.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The point of the matrix representation of a linear transformation is (in the R² -> R² case) that:

[tex] T \left( \begin{array}{c c}x \\ y \end{array} \right)<br /> = <br /> A \left( \begin{array}{c c}x \\ y \end{array} \right)[/tex]

where T is your linear transformation and A is its matrix representation.


If you write down an arbitrary 2x2 matrix for A, then from:

[tex] T \left( \begin{array}{c c}x \\ y \end{array} \right)<br /> = <br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array} \right)<br /> \left( \begin{array}{c c}x \\ y \end{array} \right)[/tex]

you can solve for a, b, c, and d if you know T.


Do you know if you can explain to me how you find the Av of each matrix?
I have no idea what this means.
 
Last edited:
ahh i made it way too complicated, thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K