Conservation of energy question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a conservation of energy problem involving a girl on a swing, analyzing her speed at different points in the swing's motion. The subject area includes concepts of potential and kinetic energy in the context of mechanical systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between potential and kinetic energy, questioning which height to use in calculations. There are discussions about the relevance of the swing's length and the potential consideration of angular velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering different perspectives on how to approach the problem. Some suggest using the complete conservation of energy equation, while others emphasize the importance of consistent height measurement. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem's setup may allow for multiple interpretations regarding the height used in calculations and the relevance of the swing's length. There is also mention of potential additional formulas related to pendulum motion that could provide further insights.

dnt
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
a girl on a swing, which is 4 m long, is 2.0 m high at her highest point (all the way back) and 0.5 m above the ground at the closest point (at the bottom).

question is how fast is she going and when?

im pretty sure her fastest point is at the bottom.

to solve it i think you set potential energy equal to kinetic (mgh = 1/2mv^2) and solve for v. but what h do you use? is it 2.0 m or 1.5 m (the difference in heights from top to lowest point)?

also, what's the point in mentioning the 4 m long string?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you considered rotational energy? [itex]PE_{top} = RE_{bottom} - PE_{bottom}[/tex]<br /> <br /> Just an idea..[/itex]
 
well the height you use is atbitrary just as long as you use it all the way through the problem.

the reason they tell you the length of the swing is you need it to figure out angular velocity
 
angular velocity? we haven't done that yet. why can't i just solve setting potential and kinetic equal to each other (mgh = 1/2mv^2) and solving for v?
 
Try thinking of the problem using the complete statement of conservation of energy:

[tex]{PE}_{bottom} + {KE}_{bottom} = {PE}_{top} + {KE}_{top}[/tex]

The information that you're given fits perfectly into this approach. (except for the length of the string, which isn't needed)

Note that in this approach, you can measure the height from whatever point you like, when calculating the PE, so long as you're consistent about it.
 
Last edited:
dnt said:
a girl on a swing, which is 4 m long, is 2.0 m high at her highest point (all the way back) and 0.5 m above the ground at the closest point (at the bottom).
question is how fast is she going and when?
im pretty sure her fastest point is at the bottom.
to solve it i think you set potential energy equal to kinetic (mgh = 1/2mv^2) and solve for v. but what h do you use? is it 2.0 m or 1.5 m (the difference in heights from top to lowest point)?
also, what's the point in mentioning the 4 m long string?
Use the difference in the height (you want to know how much potential energy you lost, not how much potential energy you have at any given point)

Did they give you the formula for the period of a pendulum? This would allow you to attach a time to each position (starting from 2 m high to the bottom of her swing, to the highest point all the way forward, bottom on the way back, etc).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
4K