Uniform continuity and bounded

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between uniform continuity and boundedness of a function on a bounded set. The original poster seeks to prove that if a function is uniformly continuous on a bounded set, then it must also be bounded on that set.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of uniform continuity and whether the proof can rely on properties of closed intervals. There is a discussion about the nature of bounded sets and the requirements for sequences within those sets.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants questioning assumptions about the nature of bounded sets and the conditions necessary for sequences to demonstrate boundedness. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Cauchy sequences, but clarity on specific requirements for sequences is still being sought.

Contextual Notes

There is an acknowledgment that not all bounded sets are closed, which affects the proof strategy. The need for additional conditions on sequences, such as convergence, is under consideration.

1800bigk
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Prove that if f is uniformly continuous on a bounded set S then f is bounded on S.

Our book says uniform continuity on an interval implies regular continuity on the interval, and in the previous chapter we proved that if a function is continuous on some closed interval then it is bounded. Is that how I should prove this, or am I missing something? It seems to easy this way and that usually means I am overlooking something.


tia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're overlooking the fact that not all bounded sets are intervals.

A possible way to prove the result, is to use that a uniformly continuous function maps Cauchy sequences to Cauchy sequences. If you assume that f is unbounded on S, this will lead to a contradiction.
 
I was just getting ready to say just because S is bounded doesn't mean S is closed and I need S to be closed to go the easy way. I supposed f is uniformly continuous and unbounded then I said since S is bounded then there is a convergent sequence {Xn} in S by bolzano and since {Xn} converges then {Xn} is cauchy. Since f is uniformly continuous on S then f(Xn) is cauchy so f is bounded, contradiction
 
That's not correct, but on the right path. You don't actually have a contradiction (unbounded sets can (and always do!) contain Cauchy sequences). You need to place more requirements on x_n.
 
what kind of requirements do I need? Do I need to say something about Xn converging to an element in S? Do I need to use subsequences?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K