Recent content by anuttarasammyak

I got ##\bar{V}## is molar volume. Thanks. A gas with a known number of moles n is placed in a container whose volume can be varied and is brought into thermal equilibrium with a heat reservoir. In the limit where the volume is increased while maintaining equilibrium, the temperature of the...

I just comment on limit $$P \rightarrow 0$$. As P has physical dimension it seems inappropriate to take its limit. It could be ##P##/ [constant which has physical dimension of pressure] << 1. And $$\frac{\lim_{P \to 0} (P \bar{V})}{R}=0$$ How does your textbook define taking the limit ?

Hello. 2. all charges both inside and outside the surface contribute to ##\mathbf{E}##. $$\int_S \mathbf{E}\cdot d\mathbf{S}$$ is proportional to enclosed charges.

Electrical conductivity anisotropic might be what you are looking for.

Interesting. In general case of base-d system, the result value is ## d^3+d^2-d-1=(d-1)(d+1)^2## For 2-digit it is ##(d-1)(d+1)##

Thank you all. I will think about it further.

Thank you so much. Then I should appreciate it if you let me know whether all these theories deal with collapse of entangled wave functions as mentioned in OP or not. May I expect that one of them rescue me ?

If no theories in the direction I have mentioned have been explored in response to the OP’s question, please excuse my oversight.

Collapse of (entangled) wave functions comes from measurement. If not only the concepts of the collapse but also measurement in general are excluded from the theory, I cannot evaluate how useful it is.

It seems that this problem cannot be properly understood without mastering relativity. Until then, however, how about the following compromise? Observers in different inertial frames who were making observations in the vicinity of measurement at A hold a meeting and present their respective...

Einsteins seems just applied the general rule of variation for product H=ABC, i.e., $$\delta H = \delta A\ B\ C+A\ \delta B\ C+A\ B\ \delta C $$

In SR, proper time of the object in motion with velocity v(t) is given by $$\tau = \int_0^T \sqrt{1-\frac{v(t)^2}{c^2}}dt$$ where once $$\tau = T = 0$$ for a common event. In the similar way, proper frame of reference, PFR, of the object couuld be made of succesive (instantaneous and local)...

You use alphabet k to mean two different quantities i.e., spring constant and wave number, which cause the confusion.

Indeed. Next I survey my environment to construct my PFR which might not be defined unikely. That will be a tough work to do.

It seems odd to me too because I think Minkowski coordinate belongs to SR or IFR where we find no problems as for Proper FR.