Recent content by aronclark1017

Although it's hard to imagine this contraption in motion at first glance. I think that's why they say "isosoles". after being corrected on my equilateral derivation by a neighbor 😡😡

Heh dry idea..I think is to never trust one person by self when it come to mechanics no debugger else is dry idea even with PhD.

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1...

I think I am settling on this style here

I have created my own application where user can navigate class fields, properties, and methods. This application also generates files that simply just list all of that information. But in some projects that are large and complex there seems to be a need for a mechanical diagram especially when...

What do you think of my personal documentation? Are diagrams such as UML a reliable standard for diagrams. If so any reference you have to code examples with UML diagrams would be appreciated.

Trying to package up a small bank account manager project that I have been tempering on for a while. One that is certainly worth something to me. Although I have created methods to whip up quick documents with all fields and properties. I would like something better to reference in order to...

yes it would appear to be missing the negative. But this documentation seems very creditable. I suppose it doesn't matter much as in this case of derivation of double angle formulas using unit circle.

the following documentation is saying that sinx=cos(3pi/2-x). In all the former cases reflecting the triangle to come off of the Y axis as you see in 90-x derives the intended value but in this cases is not showing in the this documentation example. See.. Symmetric identities If we draw a few...

Seems to me that there could be trouble here taking the limit as the x velocity becomes large such that the direction of motion in the y direction is neglected. The ratio of Y/X becomes so small as X becomes large that arctan Y//X could assumed to be 0 in some applications but here in this case...

Is moving in x direction with acceleration, y direction no acceleration

Hmm yes it seems to me that as the x velocity becomes large that one must imagine this as zooming out on the diagram in such case the y velocity vector would be become invisible but still must exist.

Software developer, mathematics and physics hobbyist and skateboarder.

TL;DR Summary: Will motion in y direction eventually stop If an object moves with initial velocity in both x and y direction and acceleration in only the x direction. If the angle of movement with the x axis will eventually become zero does that mean the object will eventually not move in the...