Recent content by Bballer152
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
Well, even though my reply is close to a year late, I thought you should know that I've read this response and I love it, THANK YOU. It all makes sense now :)- Bballer152
- Post #10
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
Okay, I think I've got it, now let's see if I can put it into words (and thanks, by the way, for the patience/hints). We use the notation of the first post above. Namely, \phi_i:U_i\times G\rightarrow \pi^{-1}(U_i) is the local trivialization such that \phi_i(p,g)=\sigma_i(p)g with the usual...- Bballer152
- Post #8
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
In particular, here is precisely what I don't understand. The argument of \mathrm{d}_Pg_i(\sigma_{i*}X) is a tangent vector on P, which means that the thing that is acting on it should have some kind of "1-form" quality to it, which is good because the thing acting on it is the exterior...- Bballer152
- Post #6
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
Well I understand how this gives a Lie-algebra valued one-form on G itself, but I don't see how it does on the full bundle P. For example, on the next page, Nakahara says that \mathrm{d}_Pg_i(\sigma_{i*}X)=0 \mathrm{\ since\ } g\equiv e \mathrm{\ along\ } \sigma_{i*}X, and again I have no clue...- Bballer152
- Post #5
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
How so? I don't see how that expression specifies an action sending tangent vectors to Lie-algebra elements...- Bballer152
- Post #3
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Notation in Ch. 10 of Nakahara
Hi All, I'm extremely confused by what's going on in section 10.1.3, pg 377 of the 2nd edition of Nakahara, in regards to his notation for lie algebra-valued one forms. We let \{U_i\} be an open covering of a smooth manifold M and let \sigma_i be a local section of M into the...- Bballer152
- Thread
- Notation
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Confirm Mistake in Nakahara's Geometry, Topology, Physics
Yes, that splitting is exactly what's going on, but that should still mean that dim_ℂT_pM^+=dim_ℂT_pM^-=\frac{1}{2}dim_ℂT_pM^ℂ=dim_ℂM as opposed to dim_ℂT_pM^+=dim_ℂT_pM^-=\frac{1}{2}dim_ℂT_pM^ℂ=\frac{1}{2}dim_ℂM, right? (The only difference is in the last equality). The +'s and -'s correspond...- Bballer152
- Post #3
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
B
Graduate Confirm Mistake in Nakahara's Geometry, Topology, Physics
Can someone please confirm that there is a typo in Nakahara's Geometry, Topology, and Physics, on page 319 (the last line of the page) in the line following equation 8.27. There is a string of equalities, all of which make sense except the last one. I believe there should be no (1/2) in front...- Bballer152
- Thread
- Mistake
- Replies: 3
- Forum: Differential Geometry