bhobba's latest activity
-
bhobba replied to the thread Undergrad How can light be a wave and particle at the same time?.Because it's neither. It's a disturbance in a quantum field that pervades all space. For the gory technical details... -
bhobba replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.It's a bit pricey, but the following does that and much more... -
bhobba reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad How can light be a wave and particle at the same time? with
Like.
The electron and the photon are particles, by definition. They are defined by their generic properties, as per the standard model of... -
bhobba reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad How can light be a wave and particle at the same time? with
Like.
No, they're not... Yes, but a quantum field is not a wave. It's a quantum field. Your next sentence contradicts this: Yes, and it's... -
bhobba reacted to Matterwave's post in the thread Undergrad How can light be a wave and particle at the same time? with
Like.
The "light is both a particle and a wave" description is a rather outdated and non-precise description of our understanding of light... -
bhobba replied to the thread A question about quantum entanglement.'In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.' Which he got from his good friend John von Neumann The exact... -
bhobba reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Graduate Sidney Coleman's opinion on interpretation in his Dirac lecture with
Like.
He says "associated with". Why not just "is"? Because actually, no, the position he describes is not Everett's relative state... -
bhobba reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Graduate Sidney Coleman's opinion on interpretation in his Dirac lecture with
Like.
But his analysis does not do that. An Everett type of explanation makes crucial use of the entanglement between the measuring device (or... -
bhobba reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Graduate Sidney Coleman's opinion on interpretation in his Dirac lecture with
Like.
Yes, he does claim that he can explain how it appears that a definite single outcome occurs. From the last paragraph of the paper...