Recent content by bhobba
-
Graduate Wavefunction in the context of quantum physics
I think you need to study Gleasons theroem and Rigged Hilbert Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9909073 In QM, the so-called Schwartz Space is often used. I have attached a dissertation covering Rigged Hilbert Spaces, but every mathematician and physicist should be conversant with...- bhobba
- Post #17
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Undergrad Single vs. Double slit coherence clarification please
At the undergrad level, see the following: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703126 It's not the last word on the subject, but at the level of this thread, it's fine. There have been more advanced discussions on this forum, but you have to start somewhere. The great Feynman, a noted...- bhobba
- Post #11
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Physics Career Prospects (outside of academia)
Why not see if you can double major in Math? Math by itself is not great. But as a foundation for in-demand jobs, it's good. Thanks Bill- bhobba
- Post #14
- Forum: STEM Career Guidance
-
Undergrad EPR revisited
These are deep issues not usually tackled at the undergrad level. I am currently reading a book that tackles them: https://www.amazon.com/Fields-Their-Quanta-Quantum-Foundations/dp/303172612X It explicitly makes an assumption - the fields are real. Effective Field Theory casts some doubt on...- bhobba
- Post #24
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
As do I The more I read Fields and Their Quanta: Making Sense of Quantum Foundations, the more I like it. I must emphasise that the book clearly states that it assumes fields are real, and particles are 'excitations' of those fields. That is an interpretation. A commonsense one, yes, but an...- bhobba
- Post #115
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
That's why I used the word compelling. One can still maintain the fields of QFT as just a calculational aid. Indeed, the Effective Field Theory view of QFT can be used as evidence for such a view. But then we are faced with the reality of particles themselves. Sure, all we have and can...- bhobba
- Post #100
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
Well, since this has touched on Realism, I suggest reading Fields and their Quanta by Art Hobson. https://www.amazon.com.au/Fields-Their-Quanta-Quantum-Foundations-ebook/dp/B0DLNLLG7Y It gives a very compelling case for Realism. Thanks Bill- bhobba
- Post #88
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
Why do we think Quantum Fields exist, and they imply the creation and annihilation of actual particles similar to the harmonic oscillator? I found a nice paper explaining it. Admittedly, beyond the intermediate level (even the book I am reading on QFT for mathematicians doesn't go into the...- bhobba
- Post #48
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
You can't throw an electric field at your head either, yet, according to Wigner's no-interaction theorem, it must actually exist. Thanks Bill- bhobba
- Post #47
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ashes It's almost like religion here in Australia. You may think cricket is genteel and boring. Then you see a fast bowler in action. I saw Jeff Thomson at his prime in Brisbane when England had no idea what hit them - frightening. Thanks Bill- bhobba
- Post #21
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect
Jingle bells, jingle bells. Darn Christmas time, good cheer, merriment and all that. I just got a copy. The only problem is, I have three books (worth over $500 in total this month, using the "it's Christmas" excuse). You can't take it with you (at least that's my reasoning anyway) I...- bhobba
- Post #19
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect
You're not kidding. On occasion, I have tried to explain it that way only to be greeted with something like - it must be wrong - it can't be like that. I have read all the popular accounts when I was young, and that assumption always seemed strange. The first serious one was using the POR and...- bhobba
- Post #18
- Forum: Quantum Physics
-
For those who ask: "What programming language should I learn?"
Yes https://slavakurilyak.com/posts/zig-and-gpus Thanks Bill- bhobba
- Post #131
- Forum: Programming and Computer Science
-
Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics
Art has written some popular accounts with Rodney Brooks. It's not cheap, but it's Christmas time, and I am 70 now - you can't take it to the grave. So I got a copy - thanks for the recommendation. I think Alesa may be a professional philosopher, and so far, it does have that flavour...- bhobba
- Post #17
- Forum: Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
-
For those who ask: "What programming language should I learn?"
From over 30 years of programming as a profession, I would start with Python because it is widely used and easy - evidently, even elementary school students are being taught it. Its issue is efficiency, as it is an intermediate bytecode language; it does not compile to machine code. Machine...- bhobba
- Post #124
- Forum: Programming and Computer Science