Recent content by Brad Barker
-
B
Graduate School Application Results and Strategies - Fall 2008
that is correct.- Brad Barker
- Post #79
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Graduate School Application Results and Strategies - Fall 2008
note to future applicants: stanford apparently doesn't care if you got a ****ing perfect score on the general gre. :/- Brad Barker
- Post #75
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Graduate School Application Results and Strategies - Fall 2008
GPA: 4.0 GRE physics: 920 GRE General --Math: 800 --Verbal: 800 --Writing: 5.5 Research: Two REU's, plus research during senior year (no publications, though) Work: TA'd for a math class; worked as a physics tutor during freshman year (and now)- Brad Barker
- Post #71
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Graduate School Application Results and Strategies - Fall 2008
today i heard from berkeley and stanford. got into berkeley. got rejected by stanford. :/ my status (physics student, here): accepted with fellowship: uiuc u chicago accepted with teaching assistantship: cornell ucsb berkeley rejected: stanford waiting on: MIT...- Brad Barker
- Post #60
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Graduate School Application Results and Strategies - Fall 2008
going to grad school for condensed matter theory uc santa barbara stanford berkeley illinois-urbana/champaign chicago mit harvard cornell at the moment, only four of the eight schools have contacted me to let me know that my application is complete. :/ i might hear back from...- Brad Barker
- Post #21
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Schools Personal pre-university curriculum
i think a solid introductory level text on calculus-based physics is sufficient. the halliday, resnick, and krane vol. 1 and 2 even have a bit of special relativity and "modern physics"-level quantum mechanics. when i was a whipper-snapper, i used another text, but it lacked the extra...- Brad Barker
- Post #2
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Which Textbook is Best for Self-Studying Condensed Matter Physics?
coincidentally, i spent today perusing through omar's elementary solid state physics, and it looks to be pretty good.- Brad Barker
- Post #2
- Forum: Science and Math Textbooks
-
B
What Are Your GRE Subject Scores and Experiences?
physics 920 (91st percentile)- Brad Barker
- Post #13
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Why Are the Terms Squared After Substitution in Green's Theorem Integral?
\frac{x^2}{a^2}+\frac{y^2}{b^2}=\frac{xy}{c^2} \smallskip \mbox{let} x=ar\cos\theta \mbox{and} y=ar\sin\theta \smallskip (r^2\cos^2\theta+r^2\sin^2\theta)^2=\frac{xy}{c^2} ...wait a minute, why does your first equation not have the terms squared, but then after the substitution, they are...- Brad Barker
- Post #5
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
B
Why Are the Terms Squared After Substitution in Green's Theorem Integral?
i just skimmed your work and noticed that you had dxdy = drd\theta . the correct relationship is dxdy = rdrd\theta .- Brad Barker
- Post #4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
B
Why Are the Terms Squared After Substitution in Green's Theorem Integral?
image not working for me. i'd recommend putting in a little bit of time to learn what you need to about latex to be able to post your problem. knowing latex is important if you intend on publishing research papers, anyway.- Brad Barker
- Post #2
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
B
What are the math prerequisites?
if there is a course offered on general relativity for undergrads, it is likely an elective, whereas quantum mechanics is typically (universally?) a requirement for a physics degree. in my experience, i took linear algebra the semester after differential equations. fairly interchangeable.- Brad Barker
- Post #9
- Forum: STEM Academic Advising
-
B
Properties of Hermitian Operators: Show Real Expectation Value & Commutativity
think of what the hermitian conjugate is for AB...- Brad Barker
- Post #4
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
B
Proof that the parity operator is hermitian
why would you want to undo the transformation? the "x" in the integral is a dummy variable, just as "y" is. let's start and end even further: <P\psi|\psi> = \int_{-\infty}^\infty<P\psi|x><x|\psi>dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty(P\psi(x))^*\psi(x)dx = \int_{-\infty}^\infty\psi^*(-x)\psi(x)dx...- Brad Barker
- Post #23
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
B
Proof that the parity operator is hermitian
it's not a function of x or y! they're just a complete set of states. you can "remove" them entirely, in a sense, and go back to bra-ket notation, where you'll clearly see that we've solved the problem. if you'd like, you can let y --> x in that last integral. it doesn't matter. it's all...- Brad Barker
- Post #21
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help