Recent content by Conn_coord

Agree that there are extremes. Or you do not understand the topic at all and your ideas are rubbish. Or you are so carried away by the study of different points of view that you become a slave to this process and you do not have time for your interpretation.

It's not funny, it's sad. A good teacher should teach thinking rather than learning by heart. Without new ideas, science degenerates. And new ideas will not appear in old textbooks, no matter how luminaries of science they would not be written.

[Moderator's note: Off topic content deleted.] Sorry, only this one. Digital Universe Part 1 https://habr.com/ru/post/645479/

I only have a link to a popular science article. It does not meet the requirements of the forum. Perhaps someone has links to sources with the required level of trust.

In theories of particle physics based on string theory, the characteristic length scale of strings is assumed to be on the order of the Planck length, or 10−35 meters. I am sure few people have heard about the long strings theory. If there is information on the topic big request to share it...

The SI uses trial and error. And that's very true! Fixation, light speeds, electric charge values are direct hits. Boltzmann's constant tightly binds temperature to energy. However, it is not correct to fix changing values - this is an error. But the error is correctable. Such "constants"...

In 2018 vacuum electric permittivity 8.854 187 8128(13) x 10^-12 vacuum magnetic permeability 1.256 637 062 12(19) x 10^-6 Wiki: Since the redefinition of SI units in 2019 (when the values of e and h were fixed as defined quantities), μ0 is an experimentally determined constant... In 2022, I...

I hope that the experiments will show a proportional change in electrical and magnetic "constants". After all, they are no longer fixed. But their multiply remains a constant. This would be a sentence for some "constants", including Planck's "constant".

I hope that in 2023 an error will be fixed, the essence of which is the fixation of the value of the Planck constant. While waiting for the appearance of new values https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/

Let`s look at the data for 2022. Will there be any problems associated with fixing the value of Planck's constant? DEADLINE NOTICE The 2022 CODATA adjustment of the fundamental constants is the next regularly scheduled adjustment. Data being used in this adjustment is required to have been...

As of 2018, R∞ and electron spin g-factor are the most accurately measured physical constants. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_constant 1998 R∞ = 10 973 731.568 549 (83) m-1 2002 R∞ = 10 973 731.568 525 (73) m-1 2006 R∞ = 10 973 731.568 527 (73) m-1 2010 R∞ = 10 973 731.568 539 (55) m-1...

[Moderator's note: post edited to remove off topic content.] Although Paul Dirac tried to justify the change in the gravitational constant. John K. Webb has been studying variations in the fine structure constant for two decades. Professor of Astrophysics at the Department of Astrophysics and...

Sorry, I know I broke the rules. It's just a pity that there is no place to discuss the issue

I think so too. Nm is not a constant, but the main counter. After all, the Universe is expanding, global characteristics are changing (size and age). But what about the mass ? Could it be that the mass of the Universe has been increasing from zero to the present day? With speed m0/t0= 1035kg/s.

H0 - Hubble constant $$N_m = \frac{c^5}{H_0^2Gh} \approx 1.16\cdot 10^{121}$$ $$N_m = \frac {5}{4\pi}\cdot \frac{2}{\alpha} \cdot e^{\frac{2}{\alpha}}$$ α - fine structure constant