Recent content by danieltanfh95

I do worry about the future of humanity when we talk as if humanity itself cannot improve or progress in a similar pace. Humans are similarly unpredictable and our capacity for learning is similarly impressive. I don't think it's healthy to assume a static posture.

Mind me for the use of words, AI is dangerous is the exact words used by the EA folk. And those risks are already being worked on by humans, so again, the technology is not the problem here, it is about how humans react to such technologies.

Oh I definitely used a search engine, since otherwise I would have to scour the libraries to find what is, to me, common sense, if anyone trying to participate in the forum corner known as "Programming and Computer Science" would bother catching up on the news to.

This is not a conspiracy theory, and it is directly being discussed by the present US government, in bad faith, like a claim that Kimi trained a world class model via distillation in the matter of weeks, when a full training run would make nearly a year. In fact, we could trace most of the...

I find it somewhat endearing that you are accusing me of just copy pasting AI when we are in a claude-designed website. The physicsforums redesign bears many marks of AI design like monospace font, the choice of colors, and the little ui details that make it distinct from a human-designed...

1. Your so called leading experts on the field are? What interests do they serve? Why is wider Asia (including Russia, Japan, Korea, South East Asia, China, the Middle East, and India) all not as worried with AI, even though nearly half (my memory may fail me, might be a lot more) of the AI...

While it is beyond my ability to suggest how to moderate the thread, I do note that we seem to afford a much wider range of speculation and emotional ranting in these threads than we do in general physics.

Be as it may that it seems we have a whole lot of personal theories on the risk or capabilities of AI thrown around here, let me try (even though I know that the evidence chain below would be largely ignored by many, even if it was obvious to me if you do educate yourself on the topic before...

I have already presented (obvious as it may be) the case that AI cannot replace humans, and humans remain crucial for any leap in capability of AI for the foreseeable future (this is evident from the case of initial data training to RL + post training, to improvements in the harnesses, to...

Perhaps it is similarly vacuous to say, as well, that this technology or situation is what would end us. I would rather proceeding cautiously, but optimistically, with the closest philosophical guidance we have in technology, which is to proceed with openness, with open science and open...

I am really not sure why you think this is "not plausible". I myself grew up in a time where my parents thought the internet or the computer was harmful in general because it would change how I think. I have good reason to think that my children would have the same struggle (as in every...

Well I do think I have presented my case with sufficient empirical evidence to present an alternative view to elevate and educate humans so we transcend beyond "petty squabbles" on whether technology in general would be the end of humanity as we know it. And these are regulations on humans, how...

I think you missed the news where social media (or the internet/computers/videogames etc) was hypothesised to control our children, and the correct response was to regulate humans or enact rules for humans, instead of restricting the technology that connects humans together.

I think that is largely a misconception, I believe, perhaps on the concept of intelligence, which reveals how little research we have on intelligence. I don't think AI is as intelligent as we think it is (otherwise why are humans involved in every major leap in capability), but we can't exactly...

I'm saying that it is irrelevant as to whether AI is a threat or not, because the problem is on humans, not the technology. This could be genetic engineering of food, solar panels or whatever fad people are up to. Consider the Max Planck quote but applied to new technology (AI in this case)...