Recent content by debajyoti datta

I wonder why nobody mentioned about Thomas' Calculus...

There is a reason why engineering is called applied physics, and in engineering, besides other techniques, a hell lot of numerical analysis is also used...back to the original question, I have read both engineering math and math methods for physics and I have found them quite similar, in fact...

and i guess radiated power will be given by Larmor's formula ?

what if we don't apply the counter force, then the system is going to radiate according the power formula of Larmor ? I mean to say the counter force is being applied externally to nullify the radiation force,isn't it ?

One of my profs also suggested me to start with Strogatz. In google books and in some lecture video i see the references are given from Hilborn ; how is that book ? Obviously i would go for the simplest one,whichever it is.

I am just a learner, a newborn baby in terms of knowledge, how dare you compare me to others ? ...ha ha...but I am insanely curious. I've printed the page and bookmarked the link for future readings. Thanks for the link.

What would be the best book for me if I want to learn nonlinear dynamics ? I have my basics clear in linear differential equations, linear system theory, integral transforms and random process if they suffice as prerequisites.

First of all,thanks for picking up my doubt. I would add a little more doubt(s). We all know that accelerating charge produces transient radiation in the form of pulse and time varying current produces steady state harmonic variation radiation. these 2 forms viz.time varying current and...

<< Moderator's note: thread spun off from https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/radiation-from-a-square-loop-of-current.868648/ >> But Sir, then why was Rutherford's atomic model rejected by physicists?

Sir,i have seen that in double sided clipping circuits..so that output is between (Vz.+Vk) and - (Vz.+Vk)..actually my question arose from there

in back to back connected diodes...current will never flow...right?

2 diodes connected back to back ...and 2 anti-parallel diodes...are these 2 configurations same...i mean work similarly?...i think NO...rectify me please if wrong...it might be a silly question but i would really appreciate the answer

thanks...and would you please say something about relative permittivity of metals ? ...or at least tell me some reliable sources to read.

@Khashishi wikipedia link does not mention that it works as dielectric...@davenn i am talking about highest frequency used for communication purposes

Will copper behave as a dielectric in high frequencies?...I tried to answer the question with loss tangent but relative permittivity of copper posed a problem...everyone on internet opines differently about relative permittivity of metals...then I looked at skin depth which decreases with...