Recent content by devious_

Bump. :wink:

Thanks. Although using my definition for the standard inner product I had to use \langle a , b \rangle = a^t \bar{y}, but it all worked out in the end.

Is there a non-ugly proof of the following identity: \langle Ax,y \rangle = \langle x,A^*y \rangle where A is an nxn matrix over, say, \mathbb{C}, A* is its conjugate transpose, and \langle \cdot , \cdot \rangle is the standard inner product on \mathbb{C} ^n.

Yeah, I agree, Java is an OK intro to programming language, but it's not an excellent language in general.

Umm, you mean Real and Complex Analysis by Rudin? For a high school student aspiring to learn physics? Are you mad?

Because they are boring as hell. :wink:

In one of the papers I marked, the student listed all the primes to brute force a question. Good thing there are only like 15 primes. :wink:

Aren't they simply those integers divisible by 9? So there should be 99,999/9 of them.

They did. You could switch to the other skin, collapse them, and switch back.

I think it was pretty cool. :approve:

The title says it all. Just wanted to point it out.

Ah, thanks. :biggrin: :blushing:

Good luck! :smile: Haha - I know what you mean!

Oops, I thought the term chiropractor meant "bone doctor." I guess I was wrong; should I have used orthopedician instead?

I'm 19 and I get allowance. (I have a part-time job during school, and ideally a full-time job otherwise.) Where I'm from, it's perfectly natural for your parents to take care of you financially until you get your degree. Then it's your turn to work your ass off so they can retire with luxury...