Recent content by Don J

Just by pure curiosity I want to know if GEM can describe "spin orbit coupling" Apparently from Wikipedia, As the master theory of classical physics general relativity has one known flaw: it cannot describe "spin orbit coupling" So they have developed...

Doug wrote The effect of gravity is very weak, and the energy of a gravity field is very small, so spotting the contribution of a very small thing to a very weak effect probably will not be possible to measure in the real world. It is very significant for the math guys. In GEM, because the...

Hi sweetser Your theory must doing something -utile (in the mathematically sense)- that GR cannot do. Do you have some examples (tests)? Is there something in the Universe who need to be -explained - with a rank one theory? If i remember You qualified GR and other -relativistic based theory-...

Can you explain for us poor laymans and -relativistic-(Einstein sense of the word)what is the ULTIMATE goal of your theory? Do you think your theory may ultimately replace GR? For now your theory seem only a "curiosity". My post is not intended to be harsh!

A good discussion netheless without too much math formulas...only pur discussion about the subject at hand...glad that you finally try to challenge your theory outside the relatively confortable independent research section of this forum...its hard to play in the major league Isn't it? Maybe...

Thanks for the precision...I admit I am a little rusty after some months out of the discussion. I need to refresh some notions about your theory.

Hello Carl I think this paper can complete your research ...because you work in that field access to this rare paper should be granted to you. Your opinion will be appreciated http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v105/i2/p735_1

Hello Doug What do you think about Arnowitt, Deser and Misner (ADM) 3+1 Form for solving the problem http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~koellein/bericht-WEB/node19.html

Just a message of WARNING .I feel very sorry to have linked to BAUT forum. I realize now after verification than that board called Against the Mainstream don't really allow for serious discussion about allternative concepts or researchs. In fact every posters with new concept are litterally...

Well it seem than the time before they set up higher order term is very near based upon this paper.I think you can even take upon the opportunity as a test for your GEM theory. Comments? A Double-Pulsar System - A Rare Laboratory for Relativistic Gravity and Plasma Physics...

Considering the 60 posts limited discussion on this board If you are interested to try the ultimate test about your theory I invite you to joint another board where you can have all the room needed for discussion with hard Einstein relativistic theorician defenders.They can check in details...

So you are in agreement than there is ACTUALLY absolutely no observationals results you can show which are in agreement with the level of accuracy you claim about your GEM prediction and the bendind of light by the sun. Dont you consider this a problem?

They make reference about tests using very-long-baseline radio interferometry which produced greatly improved determinations of the deflection of light. These techniques now have the capability of measuring angular separations and changes in angles as small as 100 microarcseconds. More details...

Hello sweetser However obsevationals results confirm GR accuracy "By 1991 the observations of radio waves from stars consistently showed that the ratio of observed deflections to the deflections predicted by general relativity is 1.0001 ± 0.00001." Do you have observationals results agreeing...

Well Tesla system have nothing in commun with radio transmission. Check these recents tests. http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/afep012.htm Edited to add The Magnifying Transmitter by Nikola Tesla : http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tmt.htm Now about my presentation the only test to verified if...