maybey I wasn't clear I'm not making new ideas in this thread, I'm simply asking why do scientists create these seemingly impossible ideas into theories. And I do have knowledge on the subject @mfb for example argument number 4, the double slit experiment supports this idea but there are other...
hello,
I find both quantum mechanics and string theory to be a bit iffy. Mabey it's just because I don't understand it but I think the best way to understand the iffy stuff is to post it on here. Mentors might see this as a debate or going against mainstream physics but how are you able to make...
@DaleSpam The edge of the universe expands faster than the speed of light from our frame of reference because of dark energy. What I'm saying is how does this happen if a FOR is infinite; is it because a reference frame degrades over a certain amount of space, if so at what rate does it degrade.
so what your saying for general relativity is that a single point's frame of reference degrades over a certain amount of space? If this is what you're saying then what is the equaton for the amount it degrades over a certain volume and also why is it different for special relativity since the...
using logic one can say that something can't just come into existence which means the energy from the big bang and time itself have always existed (I think Kalam's Law says something like this, I may have just used the law of sylogism). You could also make the argument that something can't just...
well your expanding sphere will immediately start gaining empty space unless the point starts in a black hole because the universe as a whole contains mostly empty space. If you mean when will the sphere start gaining totally empty space the answer is never because the edge of the universe is...
hello, in relativity something can go faster than the speed of light as long as it is not in the observer's frame of reference which would say that a FOR has a size but i read that a FOR was infinite in all directions. Someone explain this contradiction please!