Recent content by e-zero
-
E
Undergrad Masses in contact with each other
No, and hence net force cannot be the same. I see! :) -
E
Undergrad Masses in contact with each other
If 3 masses are in contact with each other I understand that the acceleration is the same for all if a force is applied to the first mass. Is the net force on each object also the same? Assume no friction. -
E
High School Frictionless incline and required force
So, in this example, if you we're applying the required force to push it up hill how would you bring the box to rest? -
E
High School Frictionless incline and required force
You say that once it's in motion you only have to apply the same force, but wouldn't that just keep the box at rest on the incline? -
E
High School Frictionless incline and required force
Oh right. Ok, now am I correct in saying that that opposing force has to be 'slightly greater' in order to push the box up the incline? -
E
High School Frictionless incline and required force
I have figure that out, and the only force acting, in this case, is gravity. So that would mean I would need a force mgx in the opposite direction but slightly greater correct? (mgx is the x-component of mg) -
E
High School Frictionless incline and required force
If I had to push a box with a certain weight 'm' up an incline, would I just need a force 'slightly greater' than 'mg'? (Assuming I applied the force parallel and up the incline) -
E
High School Mass gets cancelled out on downhill slope
Actually after looking at the examples again, I kinda of get it and I realize the ideas and formulas in the examples is what I will be learning more of in the following chapters. -
E
High School Mass gets cancelled out on downhill slope
Ok, I might as well post the question: A skier has begun descending a 30deg slope. Assuming the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.10, calculate the skier's acceleration. The diagram shows that the 30deg angle is at the bottom of the slope where the slope meets the ground. Forumlas for... -
E
High School Mass gets cancelled out on downhill slope
I'm looking at a general problem in which a skier is going downhill. I understand 'mathematically' how the mass will cancel out of the final equation when calculating the acceleration, but I don't understand this 'conceptually'. Can anyone describe? -
E
Bucket being lowered vertically by a rope
Damn, I missed again :/- e-zero
- Post #10
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
E
Bucket being lowered vertically by a rope
How could mg = Ft if it were lowered at a constant speed?? That would indicate that the bucket is at rest.- e-zero
- Post #8
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
E
Bucket being lowered vertically by a rope
I would say that if its lowering at a constant speed then there is no acceleration. Also, I would say that, if anything, since its moving downwards it would be decelerating. Which I guess is the same as accelerating upwards??- e-zero
- Post #6
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
E
Bucket being lowered vertically by a rope
upward- e-zero
- Post #3
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help
-
E
Bucket being lowered vertically by a rope
Homework Statement A 12.0kg bucket is lowered vertically by a rope in which there is 163N of tension at a given instant. What is the acceleration of the bucket? Is it up or down? Homework Equations Ft - mg = ma The Attempt at a Solution I solved for 'a' and got a = 3.78 m/s^2...- e-zero
- Thread
- Rope
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Introductory Physics Homework Help