Recent content by etc

i've not took the time for a proper, thorough reading of your math (i will at some .. time later;)), but I've always thought of time as a unit of measuring what truly does exist: changes. "//" this much changes from one fixed point to the next. therefore, to your thesis, that time isn't a...

0 or -0.25 via the "quadratic formula".

life could however exist as the expression of one singular thought from a degree of "life" greater than ours. almost analogous to a story book, and the person reading the story book. that we're being read. and that's all there is. Maybe!

love lasts 5 minutes. after that it's time for a cigar.

many, many people consider nursing a female's occupation. i'd say that's discouraging.

... britney .. spears.

yep grave. In Canada ( at least ), the # of girls attending University is greater than the # of males. also, science and math departments actually prefer to accept girls than boys, and regulate their acceptance policy as such.

lol, this is ridiculous. firstly, kerrie, there is a difference of being pedantic (tho "tho" is spelled "tho" for quaint's sake), and simple reading comprehension. w/e i mean. you're taking the role of the oppressed girl, and it's a bit tired. i have not witnessed any of this discouraging...

these are your "postulates": (1) an immature response is defined by "running away" and "crying". one can assume that by those you meant a) not confronting the situation (see: running away) and b) being upset by the situation (see: crying). (2) a mature response is defined by chiding...

"w/o having read but the first page" i read the first page, Kerrie. if I'm ignorant of the discussion, and you're ignorant of English, are we both happy? listen, I'm being a jerk so i may as well offer something. that girls are discouraged (because they're offended, right?), isn't that a...

w/o having read but the first page here, i shall digress to my broad analysis. those who are offended by generalizations (and scientific ones at that) are immature.

funny i suppose, tho "It is not reasonable to host an event called the "World Series" for a game which is not played outside of America." isn't true. and it's kinda arrogant. and annoying. and i can't help but feel the sentiments, while as gist, are echoed as beliefs by most people here ...

it's like .. some post is missing. bet the censor is beating off. -- etc, you kno?

to hell with your "grades". a person's quality is measured outside of school by the number of quality works he produces.

i can only assume that by "answer" you meant something logical ( because math is ruled by logical principals ). yes, no, maybe?