Can you solve for x in this equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DLxX
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation 4x^2 + x = 0, factor out the common variable x, resulting in x(4x + 1) = 0. This leads to two potential solutions: x = 0 and 4x + 1 = 0. Solving 4x + 1 = 0 gives x = -1/4 or -0.25. The discussion highlights the factoring method and confirms the solutions through basic algebraic principles. Ultimately, the equation can be solved effectively by recognizing common factors.
DLxX
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
How do I solve for x in the following question? I'm pretty sure you have to factor, but how do I solve for x with two x variables?

4x^2 + x = 0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
'x' is a common factor to both terms. Factor it out:

x(4x + 1) = 0


Do you know how to solve it now?
 
Ummm I am not too sure
 
Lol.
4x^2 + x = 0
from there, you can take out the x.
so.. x(4x+1)=0 since (that is equilivent to 4x^2 + x = 0 )
so now, you have (x) times (4x+1) equals 0, what do either have to be in order for the equation to equal 0?
0!
so you have x=0 and 4x+1=0
you solve for x, and you get 0,-1/4
 
0 or -0.25 via the "quadratic formula".
 
EDIT: Yup I figured it out before I refreshed the page lol. Thanks guys.
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Solve Equation: $x^4+2x^3-x^2-6x-3=0$
Replies
7
Views
1K
I Why fixed point iteration of ##x^3 = 1-x^2## doesn't converge when ##x_0= 0##
Replies
16
Views
518
B Solving equations but getting an identity - what mistakes were made?
Replies
4
Views
896
MHB Can graph be used to solve inequalities without algebra?
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Solve $x^4+(4-x)^4=32$ Equation
Replies
2
Views
994
B Given an equation, find the value of this expression
Replies
17
Views
2K
B Are Implication and Equivalence Interchangeable in Logic?
Replies
9
Views
2K
MHB Solve Differential Eq: xe^-1/(k+e^-1) for x, k, t
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Can the same argument be used for both radians and degrees in the sine function?
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB Solve $(x^2-7x+11)^{x^2-13x+42}=1$ Equation
Replies
7
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top