Recent content by exeric

To quote RR's famous line:"There you go again!" You are assuming things based on the incomplete information you have and then extending it into perpetuity. There "are" published papers proposing experiments for quantum entanglement. These papers, including one published by me, and in the APS...

You are wrong. I can think of at least another. Eric

I thought I said you could delete the post involving quantum entanglement in protons. Do you want to argue with me now by projecting on to me that I didn't accept that? I did. Are you annoyed because I accepted it with protest? Well, then be annoyed. I'm annoyed too. But I'm not threatening...

It's hard to know where to begin. The most blatant problem with quantum entanglement is in asking where the energy for quantum entanglement comes from. Do you actually think conservation of energy is not involved in the quantum entanglement process? If you accept that "free lunch" premise then...

Ok, delete those posts. But don't delete my first two posts to this thread. There is nothing wrong with them being placed here. I think its a very fine line between trying to advance knowledge by challenging accepted theory and quarantining new ideas to a "safe" place, where they can be ignored...

Why don't you let people pick apart what I've said before you delete it. And if people wish to pick apart what I've said it is always a good idea to first debate the concepts presented by the messenger than to debate the quality of the messenger himself. That is one of the first principles of...

I, myself don't think that quantum entanglement can be considered as something relative to the way that it is measured. It might have been an open question before the vast experimental evidence has built up, but I don't think it can be said anymore. Entanglement is not an "interpretative" event...

I'd still be interested in any responses to what I said above. I realize what I'm saying maybe a little off in right field to some of you but I really think Bell's inequality is just a starting point for understanding quantum entanglement. It just shows that the non-locality of correlative...

Hi, I've done some study on this problem of non-locality and have reached my own conclusions. I've written a paper with my own plausible explanation for it. But rather than muck things up with my own ideas right off the bat I'd like to pose some questions for people who are not afraid to think...

I hope you're right. I'm always for progress in science even at the cost of my own ideas as long as the other person's theory is proven right.

I understand you believe in gravity waves but at some point mathematical proof or prediction(as in GR) no longer can be taken on faith. Unfortunately one can never prove a negative. I don't know what you think about string theory but it also is mathematically valid and self consistant. Its not...

I have a question. How long can a theory of gravity that includes gravity waves exist in the face of zero, zip, nada experimental evidence? Isn't there a statute of limitation for believing in these things. I think a theory, no matter how intriguing, becomes pseudoscience after a certain amount...

I think the word "teleportation" as related to entangled pairs is a red herring. I think there is a much closer analogy to entangled pairs in things like remote robotic surgery. In this instance the movements that the surgeon makes remotely also happen in the surgery room by a robot. If you...

I think it would be interesting to analyze how time relates in the cloud chamber of a particle accelerator- that is to analyze the vector movement of any particle and then analyze the vector movement of its antiparticle. If you analyze the antiparticle as an antiparticle it moves as a vector...

I seldom read such objective well written posts as I've read in your Electromagnetism and the Photon post. I think in some ways we are both blessed and cursed to be living at a time when momentous theories are coming to the fore in physics. Blessed in that roadblocks to progress in theoretical...