FactChecker's latest activity
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining with
Like.
If you lay the 100 cards out in a row, there is a statistical symmetry going first to last or last to first. -
FactChecker replied to the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining.Of course! I think that does it.
-
FactChecker reacted to Dale's post in the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining with Like.
I am not sure either. But probably it would be something like there are as many permutations of the deck with 3 greens at the beginning...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining.That's what I initially thought and, IMO, your simulation proves that is the final answer. I guess is that, if there are more of one...
-
FactChecker reacted to Dale's post in the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining with
Informative.
I did a Monte Carlo simulation of 100000 shuffles with drawing from the front and got a mean value of 1.514 and a simulation of 100000... -
FactChecker replied to the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining.That was my first thought, and it still might be valid. But an abundance of one color certainly changes the odds of the last card...
-
FactChecker reacted to Dale's post in the thread Graduate Expected numbers of cards of a last color remaining with
Skeptical.
That would be the same as drawing N cards without replacement that match the first color. -
FactChecker reacted to russ_watters's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
That's a hard sell to the family of a guy who got decapitated when his self-driving car drove under a truck it thought was a cloud.
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I don't know what computer program provides the step-by-step scores of black versus white chess positions in the YouTube videos of...
-
FactChecker reacted to webplodder's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
I think the emergence of a 'mind' within LLMs should be seen as an abstraction from the basic hardware and software. Once that’s...
-
FactChecker reacted to webplodder's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Fair enough - let's flip it. Even if we slice AI up by type, "sum" and "more than" don't need fancy definitions. They just mean: does...
-
FactChecker reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Not everyone in the AI field agrees with this assertion. It's not clear the extent to which an LLM understands things. Clearly not as...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.A lot of people who get their information from the internet are less informed than chatgpt. I don't think they are really smart, but...
-
FactChecker replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.This discussion has started to include too much. "Is AI more than the sum of its parts" is a vague question, but we can make some...
-
FactChecker reacted to Filip Larsen's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Exactly. An often used measure of intelligence is the ability to detect and apply patterns, and training of neural networks are a...