gentzen's latest activity
-
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.But what does it actually mean? The Thing-in-itself is unknowable. Only representation and observation are knowable. (I took those two...
-
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.I'm not convinced that "relativity of simultaneity" is based on much stronger grounds. Maybe the microwave background defines a...
-
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.You quoted: I mean the property of QM first emphasized by Everett, to which Bohmians will point, if Arnold Neumaier or Robert Helling...
-
gentzen reacted to RUTA's post in the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality with
Like.
You are correct, there is a counterintuitive consequence of the observer-independence of h corresponding to the relativity of... -
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.In Everett's thesis, he analyses the predictions of QM based on the information available to the agent which tries to verify them. In...
-
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.If they were exactly analogous, you should also be able to spell out what corresponds to "relativity of simultaneity" in the case of QM...
-
gentzen replied to the thread Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality.The red Insights tag in the thread title is gone now.
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I didn't buy the book, I read the copy from a public library. I don't remember whether I noticed that actually Leighton was the author...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.How can you trust Ralph that the quotes are directly from Feynman, given he is so dishonest when it comes to the actual author of the...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation.See here for what this difference implies: My toy model itself was:
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Or maybe, rather don't read it. This book was not written by Richard Feynman, but by Ralph Leighton. This is hinted at by "Adventures of...
-
gentzen reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
No. That's not how the MWI works. In the MWI, all possible outcomes occur, each in its own branch of the wave function. It's not even...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation.It seems to me that what changes is the rate of change of the phase, not the phase itself. I guess the most direct interpretation of...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation.Are you sure? It is true that you can factorize ##\partial_t^2\phi=c^2\partial_x^2\phi## (1D-WE) into...
-
gentzen replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.There is a Q&A at the end, starting at 49:19, which contains stuff not contained in that transcript. Below, I collected how I tried to...
