Recent content by HBrown

Mitchel Porter already brought up an explicit example. Furthermore, you are expanding the hype beyond what even Wolfram is claiming, with your added layer of abstraction to a black box that can automatically unify any mathematical research we shove in the box First, it is incredibly difficult...

I'm sorry, but Auto-Didact you are putting a lot of words in Wolfram's mouth. I feel what you are saying is unrecognizable to the actual content of what he wrote. It would be easier to discuss these things if you clearly separated ideas this inspires for you (where you think this will grow as a...

I read through his initial post. He's clearly excited about some ideas, but they are still vague, and to some extent he seems aware of this. He seems to make the common mistake of being just vague enough about some important pieces that he can oscillate between different concepts as it suits his...

It would help if you answered the pertinent questions instead of providing more predictions. You stated: Despite saying that, you have yet to define a clear procedure that would allow a computer to determine this. When I tried to bring actual math in, you instead then suddenly claimed that...

The more I read, the more I am worried your definition of a "tangle" and "equivalence" of tangles is different than everyone elses. Usually for tangles, the boundary is chosen and fixed, and then various configurations of the ropes inside are studied. Many of your ideas feel like a mish-mashing...

Are any of the bosons also separated into two different left/right chiral fields? Or only the fermions?

I feel like stuff is being swept under the rug just because I made an incorrect claim about your electron tangle. If the neutrino and its reflection are topologically equivalent, then it must be possible to recreate any projection. But these two projections seem to distinguish the two...

String was too floppy, I had to play with this in mathematica and rigidly rotate around for a bit with different strand configurations to see what you were describing. You are correct about the electron tangle not having a projection with only two crossings. That was my mistake. Since you...

Sure, here is a viewpoint showing two crossings But since two of the electron stands could be straight and meet your above/below paper requirements, then I can do the same for the electron as well. As I said: I see no way you can consider these topologically equivalent without thinking the...

This in no way addresses the issue I pointed out. The electron, neutrino, and W tangles can be squished onto a plane just like your W tangle diagram, for as long as you want ... all the way out to the edge of the universe if you want, and then straight lines from there to infinity. This means...

Sometimes I hear particle physicists refer to left/right chiral electrons as different particles that are 'mixed' by the mass term. Maybe I misunderstood entirely, but if there is even a handwavy sense in which this is the case, clarifications would be appreciated. In high energy collisions...

I believe we are nearing an impasse. I have repeatedly asked for clear definitions and equations, but your answers continue to be vague and leaves your theory a black box with an oracle, we must turn to you to put anything into the theory and turn to you to interpret anything coming out of the...

Then please define it clearly enough that we could program it in a computer then. It currently seems to have no rhyme or reason to it, and you include no equations to make your ideas precise. Here are three "rational tangles" They look very similar, yet you assign them different charges...

Can you walk us through your thought process for deciding there are no particles in that configuration? More specifically, can you please define how one can _systematically_ take a strand configuration and extract what particles are represented. For example if someone made a computer...

cshiller, If all particles are unknots, can you show us an example configuration of strands that represents a chunk of 3D vacuum? Is it something like this? (made with mathematica, 3x3 lines parallel to each axis, not intersecting) Can you place your new paper on arxiv? Now that particles are...