jack action's latest activity
-
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Well, anyone who wants to see intelligence in a machine can just say: "It is intelligent because it fooled me." Not a very scientific... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.From Wikipedia [bold emphasis mine]: Can the human evaluator use a tool to help him do the job? If he is nearsighted and both text... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.There is a big flaw in the Turing test: It is assumed that the judge is a simple human. But what if the judge is using AI for... -
jack action reacted to Dale's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
From what I can tell, AI conferences spend very little time on Turing tests. It does not seem to be a metric of much importance to the... -
jack action reacted to Dale's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
Sorry, I don’t think you are being consistent here. You were complaining about other people moving the goalposts and now you are doing... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Now that we know what you think, let's see what the experts have to say about the Turing test: But even 21st-century AI researchers... -
jack action reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
I don't agree with your major hypothesis. I don't think intelligence is required to deceive in the sense the paper you referenced is... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.It sounds more simplistic than logic, especially without definitions of "intelligent" or "lie". To link a lie to intelligence, you must...