jack action's latest activity
-
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.It is still a fixed parameter and, once determined, repeating the calculations should yield the same results. If the data and... -
jack action reacted to Grinkle's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
A hallucination is an example of an undesirable output, as is a racist comment. I'm not sure its easier to identify the source of a... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.With ordinary software, a bug can also be a question of quality control: we haven't analyzed what a user might input into a program. For... -
jack action reacted to Grinkle's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
This discussion on hallucinations connected a dot for me that I really should have connected long ago. I spent many years of my career... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.It is "unpredictable" because the bugs are harder to find. ChatGPT-4 is estimated to have roughly 1.8 trillion parameters. Good luck... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Maybe not in literature, but the test was brought up in this thread as proof that AI is intelligent: I must admit I worry about the... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Well, anyone who wants to see intelligence in a machine can just say: "It is intelligent because it fooled me." Not a very scientific... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.From Wikipedia [bold emphasis mine]: Can the human evaluator use a tool to help him do the job? If he is nearsighted and both text... -
jack action replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.There is a big flaw in the Turing test: It is assumed that the judge is a simple human. But what if the judge is using AI for...