javisot's latest activity
-
Jjavisot reacted to RUTA's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with
Like.
Here is a 2023 paper relevant to this thread Many-Worlds: Why Is It Not the Consensus? Abstract: In this paper, I argue that the... -
JYes, for base models, i.e. for "pure" LLM that do no fact checking, but as noted in the paper it is in principle easy to establish fact...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is AI Overhyped?.I highlight two paragraphs from this interesting paper: "Hallucinations are inevitable only for base models. Many have argued that...
-
JHallucinations are a mathematical inevitability and impossible to reduce to zero according to their own paper...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement? with Like.
My point is that in the phrase "objectively true" the adverb objectively adds no meaning to the phrase. The entire concept of truth is...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I Is there a bad intuition or bad explanation in quantum entanglement?.I've never heard those terms used in physics. Perhaps "physical reality" was once used as the regime of reality that can be described by...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Certainly QFT as we have it is effective to an extraordinary degree and I have no problem with discussing asymptotic states, but I think...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics.A very interesting article. I've been wondering about this for a while. Personally, I've noticed that physicists sometimes talk about...
-
Jjavisot reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I A very interesting paper on orthodox quantum mechanics with Like.
Beck, G. (2025). How to be an orthodox quantum mechanic. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20597 From the abstract: From the conclusion:
-
Jjavisot reacted to Jaime Rudas's post in the thread B Rutgers finds a transparent Einstein Cross - apparently a dark matter "halo" with Like.
I think you underestimate the enormous retrospective adaptability that these "theories" have always demonstrated.
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.Having a good map helps us explore the territory more effectively, but we shouldn't confuse the map with the territory. Both are...
-
Jjavisot reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Good theories (of which good models are anintegral part) have a high explanatory power, revealed by appropriate computations (that...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
You mean a local hidden-variable theory cannot reproduce all of QM's predictions. A non-local hidden-variable theory can.
-
Jjavisot reacted to A. Neumaier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Yes. The evolution of the radiated system in a homogeneous medium is generally assumed to be unitary, with an effective dynamics...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
Fine, but you can think of toss as internal environment. (For the notion of internal environment in QM see e.g. my...