javisot's latest activity
-
Jjavisot reacted to .Scott's post in the thread Undergrad Valid local explanation of Bell violations? (Pegg et al., 1999; 2008) with
Like.
The Sutherland paper cited in the OP claims that locality can be preserved when a retro-causal mechanism is employed. In most cases... -
JI believe we have a recent, extant example of it doing exactly* that, kicking around here somewhere, sometime in the last six months...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad.For example, if you create a theory of Everything (ToE) right now and show it to chatgpt, then tell a friend to ask chatgpt about this...
-
JBefore we start, let's be very clear. The light clock works. The purpose of this thread is not for you to explain why it doesn't work...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Borek's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with Like.
Several processes - one is that at some point "all questions were already answered", quite often it was enough to google for problem to...
-
Jjavisot reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
It doesn't seem to me like that at all. But it may be that I don't understand it, and I am projecting my own philisophical prejudices...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics."In this way, RQM succeeds in making sense of a fully quantum world without requiring hidden variables, many worlds, physical collapse...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
You missed this part: "even these events can be described in a different way by different physical systems". This is the part I would...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Please don't create confusion. The paragraph you mentioned and tried to correct is by Rovelli, not me. My words don't confirm...
-
Jjavisot reacted to bhobba's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Well, since this has touched on Realism, I suggest reading Fields and their Quanta by Art Hobson...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.? No, it's a paragraph literally written by Rovelli.
-
Jjavisot reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
The first sentence is a response to those who argue that RQM would be a solipsistic interpretation. Somehow, the typical confusion...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.I insist that in Rovelli's RQM vision, objects don't even exist, he says in the article that martinbn shared: "Dorato observes that the...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.I don't understand, physica; what you're correcting isn't a paragraph of mine, it's Rovelli's. Furthermore, I don't understand the...