That is also true for smaller particles from atoms?
How we know they move deterministic, but scientist allways say that this small praticles moves randomly?
Is chaos random or deterministic?
Is "random physics" just show that some information we are missing?
I think Einstien dont believe something happen random
If I release double pendulum from 100% same haight and angle hunderd times, every single time path must be the same?
If this is case, than chaos dont exist in nature ,it is just consequence that we dont know well enough all inital conditions?
Because if we can predict something than this is...
All double pendulum have same inital position, start from same height at same time, this softwear must have some equations from which calculate their path, so if both use same eqution and same inital position, why they have different paths(this is mathematicaly impossible)?
One question about...
In this discussion, I agree with @Dale opinion : "In order to light up a bulb must have a substantial amount of current through it. It is not designed to do that in response to a small RF signal propagating through free space. Although such a signal exists and would produce some minuscule...
Yes he is correct only in a part that small current will travel through bulb at t=1/c, but this small induced current will not turn light ON.
If bulb need aprox voltage of battery(that is ussualy case) then induced current is many billions too small to start the light..
So this is trick...
Dont agree with answer 1/c, this is trick question,because he said any amount of energy/ current will turn on light bulb..
If any current will turn on light,then yes he is right...
But this "induced current" is so low, it is not enough to trigger light...so answer 1m/c is wrong, correct...