Recent content by john-of-the-divine

electrodynamics, I herd that alongside aether. is that more of a subatomic particle reaction?

thank you so very much.

math is like a road map. there are many roads that can take you to get to many destinations, and you can get from any destination to any destination. from point a to point b there are many routes you can take to get you there. problem is, we are learning the routes and the stops and the...

no, that's not my question.

can you point me to a source on that by any chance. I can't find one.

math is a form of explanation. it can tell us how to build something, but it doesn't build it for us.

it's like looking at the sun when your under water. the sun appears to be on the surface of the water.

what if the Michelson Morley experiment failed because the spliter and mirrors each technically became a new "source" of light.

exactly

ok, then we can only observe what we can observe. by you saying no is saying every thing in exictance is observable to us now. that heresy against science

and we can only observe what we can see

see, that's what I'm saying, is the math "calibrated" big enough? guess that's a better question. light is a photon, right? and everything else of the known energy spectrum, are those made of photons?

hey, he said he might not have enough knowledge thankyou, I appreciate it a lot.

thank you, all of you. I know th8s is a debate I should have had with my professor, but I never got that chance. I appreciate the patience and non-buttheadness. I am, i feel, an ameture philosopher, at least some one noticed, lol. I do want to understand because because science is a big part of...

I'm not necessarily anti math, and I'm not unwilling to learn it, i was just looking for explanations that don t evolve math. sorry to waste your time. thank you for at least trying.