Recent content by LarryC

  1. LarryC

    Second Quantization - Quasiparticles

    (Simplified version of Baym, Chapter 19, Problem 2) Calculate, to first order in the inter-particle interaction V(r-r'), the energy of an N+1 particle system of spin-1/2 fermions with on particle of momentum p outside an N-particle Fermi sea (quasiparticle state). The answer should be expressed...
  2. LarryC

    How Can Quantum Mechanics Explain the Eigenstates of a Spherical Pendulum?

    Thanks for the great reference! I am just wondering if I can get something related to the harmonic oscillator from out of the approximate form $$ \bigg[\frac{L^2}{2ml^2}+\frac{1}{2}mgl\theta^2\bigg]\psi = E\psi $$ This looks like a harmonic oscillator, but ##L## contains both ##\theta## and...
  3. LarryC

    How Can Quantum Mechanics Explain the Eigenstates of a Spherical Pendulum?

    I have trouble with finding the eigenstates of a spherical pendulum (length $l$, mass $m$) under the small angle approximation. My intuition is that the final result should be some sort of combinations of a harmonic oscillator in $\theta$ and a free particle in $\phi$, but it's not obvious to...
  4. LarryC

    Simultaneous Diagonalization for Two Self-Adjoint Operators

    (a) and (b) are fairly traditional, but I have trouble understanding the phrasing of (c). What makes the infinite dimensionality in (c) different from (a) and (b)?
  5. LarryC

    Undergrad What specific momentum should be used in the matter wave?

    Yep I understand this. But what confuses me is the huge difference between the classical theory and the relativity when calculating the frequency. I mean, for example, consider a particle moving at a low speed. Then f=E/h gives either f=mc^2/h from relativistic perspective or f=mv^2/(2h) in...
  6. LarryC

    Undergrad What specific momentum should be used in the matter wave?

    According to de Broglie's hypothesis, the matter wavelength could be described by lamda=h/p. But which momentum, the classical p=mv, or the relativistic one p=mv(1-v^2/c^2)^(-1/2) should be used in this equation? Additionally, an even more confusing issue to me is regarding the other relation...