Recent content by LGram16

Hm. Didn't know that. Sounds way to overcomplicated compared to now, although technology at the time of CRT TVs didn't allow for that, but still.

I thought that the mass grew because it need an increasing amount of power. Think of it like this. A rocket ship needs a lot of fuel. If it wants to go faster, it needs more fuel. If it wants to go at the speed of light, it needs an infinite amount of fuel, therefore infinitely massive...

Unless you are amish or an amazonian indigenous tribe the yes.

The point you are conveying here sounds similar to the hairy ball theorem and how all the hair can't be combed in on direction because there is always a point where the vector is 0.

Think about it this way: we exist in spacetime. You say things wouldn't move? Well, let's use your paper example. If I set a paper clip on the paper, and then curved the piece of paper to a convexed (hump) shape, would it slide of? Yes. The same occurs with spacetime in a general sense.

I know. I meant how is it true?

Yes. what I am saying is i don't see why human (or other means of) observation collapses the function of why the cat is both alive and dead. The means of observation collapses the function of whether or not the cat is alive or dead. the cat should never have been alive and dead. Human...

I agree, to me it doesn't make any sense. Anyway, that said 'phenomenon' is the basis of the Schrodinger's cat idea, that says that the cat is in a position of being alive and dead at the same time, until an observer sees if the cat is alive or dead, collapsing the function. The thing i don't...

Okay, I didn't really know where to post this, but whenever I hear about this paradox it is in a conversation relating to physics. Anyway, for those that don't know the paradox, it states that to get to point 'B', one must get halfway there before they can be all the way there. And to get...