Homework Statement
My questions are as follows:
(1) If I apply a force (B) on a beam with a center of gravity at the middle(A), it will JUST cause a moment, correct?
(2) If I remove this fixed point(A), and no gravity or any other forces are present, will it still JUST cause a moment or will...
Homework Statement
Hi,
Having some trouble with answering this question:
A thin nonconducting rod with a uniform distribution of +'ve charge 'Q' is bent into a circle of radius R. There is an axis, 'z' which originates in the center of this ring.
In terms of 'R', at what +'ve value of...
Is a weak acids concentration determined from when it is in equilibrium, or if it hasn't dissociated at all?
i.e. 0.100M CH3COOH. Would this be the concentration of CH3COOH during it's equilibrium:
CH3COOH <-|-> CH3COO- + H+
Or just by itself?
Thanks!
Okay so as an update my problem is:
I can't differentiate between (as an example) 52C1*51C1 and 52C2
what's the intuitive difference? selection group?
EDIT:
Apparently it's due to order not mattering. My problem here is, the solution to this question, which is
13C1*4C3*12C2*4C1*4C1
I'm not...
I'm having trouble differentiating between 52C1*51C1, and 52C2, why are they not the same thing?
Jack of Hearts
Jack of Spades
Jack of Clubs
Thee of Spades
Seven of Diamonds
I would say the 6 choices that produce this hand would be:
First rank is:
Three
The three accompanying suits...
Oh, sorry! 52C1*51C1
Brilliant! That's exactly how I'm viewing it in my head. I'm not sure where my logic fails.
I suppose with the first two steps i would choose
13C1*4C3
This would pick a rank and then for the rank that was picked, choose three of the four suits for a combination...
Homework Statement
if three of the cards have the same face value and the other two have different face values?
Homework Equations
nCr or (n!)/((n-r)!(r!))
The Attempt at a SolutionSo far i have this for a solution
(13C1) * (4C3) * (12C1) * (4C1) * (11C1) * (4C1)
Where xCy is a...
Okay, that makes sense, however my question is, why do we only want to deal with the upper bound and not the lower bound as well?
I also think i understand this here, simply because if |x+2| has a maximum of 5 (rather infinitesimally close to 5) we can say that |x-2||x+2| will always be less...