Morbert's latest activity

Forward-in-time models readily apply in the Delayed Choice case.

Not sure if it's been brought up in this thread, but section 3/4 of this paper seems to work out the details in a toy model (I think...

Bohmian mechanics treats a wavefunction as nomological or ontological, and supplies a primitive ontology. It's quite distinct from the...

"For instance, our fundamental law that any state can be made up from a linear combination of base states is written as ##\ket{\psi} =...

A basic level of understanding of quantum theory is needed for any kind of advancement of the discussion. Fundamentally misunderstanding...

Re/ Bohmian mechanics and entanglement swapping: I'm finding it conceptually straightforward but computationally fiddly. Considering...

You keep trying to move off the point, which will just result in mistakes compounding mistakes. It is not cherry picking to point out Ma...

Ma says "This can be seen by rewriting Eq. (1) in the basis of Bell states of photons 2 and 3.". I am not picking apart anything. I...

I'm not moving off this point until you acknowledge it. Ma explicitly says (2) is a rewriting of (1) in a Bell basis. You keep writing...

What Ma actually says is (2) is arrived at by "rewriting Eq. (1) in the basis of Bell states of photons 2 and 3" (Ma's exact words)...

I responded to that in post post #201...

Ma explicitly says (2) is a rewriting of (1) in the basis of Bell states of photons 2 and 3. Did he misspeak?

Equation (2) does not present photon 2 and 3 in a Bell state. It instead shows the initial state expanded in a Bell basis. An analogous...

@DrChinese is unfortunately caught in a closed loop where he will deny this QM math based on his misreading of Ma's paper, and his...

The RHS of @Morbert's equation in #171 is, yes. But not the RHS of Peres' equation (6) or Ma's equation (2). You appear to believe that...