I would like to know, how much a stars life would appear to lengthen relativisticly as observed from earth, if the star was in a close orbit around a supermasive black hole. If the stars lifespan is longer from our perspective than a star of its size should be, would it also appear to be...
I like the way you think.. I also don't have the proper education.. But imagination is the importent thing.. I would love to discuss theories with you..
im looking for the matter - energy equivelence video .. it shows 10 pieces in a square and then they get rearanged and u end up with 1 piece of "energy out" and the puzzle seems to have the same "mass" ? i can't find this video can someone help me please?
if so and if up to that point they both see the other observers clock as ticking slow then at what point to they speed up so as that they can both agree as they pass each other?
Take a look at this following paragraph that i wrote in another thread
"think of two rockets moving at each other under inertia at a course so that they pass very close. Observer A will look at both clocks when the rockets pass. he will see his own as being T and he will see observer B,s...
this is something i wrote in the forum "are relativistic effects real"
"think of two rockets moving at each other under inertia at a course so that they pass very close. Observer A will look at both clocks when the rockets pass. he will see his own as being T and he will see observer B,s...
i had the thought experiment set up so that the rocket was traveling under inertia with no acceleration to get to speed
sorry kev but that cannot be true.. if two bodies are inertially traveling toward each other they will both see the others clock as being the slow one. so the space man can...
If two entangled particles will change when the other does and we have the instruments to detect this change then it is information. Think of the particles two states as on and off 1 and 0. there is no reason that information could not be transferred like this.. Also if we detect the change...
I'm going to state that two inertial bodies that close distance on each other will (becouse of loss of simultaneity)observe time dilation. Also i will state that when one body accelerates it will actually time dilate from its frame of origin. So with this stated, if a rocket traveling under...
OK I GOT IT... loss of simultaneity . observers are a and b
think of two rockets moving at each other under inertia at a course so that they pass very close. Observer A will look at both clocks when the rockets pass. he will see his own as being T and he will see observer B,s clock as...
what i gain from this is if i have a clock and the other person sees it running slow and we both stop as we meet, he will see my clock hand on one # and ill see it on another #... that is imposable one observer will have to see the others clock as being fast... if i leave Earth and travel to our...
ok I am sorry but all your doing is rewording the original problem "if a flash is emitted in the center of the train , one observer will see it hit both ends simultaneously and the other will not" don't try to reword it or change the that scenario, you will only delay your understanding of it...
i think what stillwander is getting at is... what will happen to the clocks?... they are moving they were synced while moving... if they are not going to stay synced then which one will be fast which one slow?