Nasa speaks of the either the space shuttle or the ISS

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter neh4pres
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Iss Nasa Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the misconceptions surrounding NASA's terminology regarding gravity in relation to the Space Shuttle and the International Space Station (ISS). Participants clarify that astronauts experience microgravity due to free fall, not the absence of gravity. They emphasize that while gravity is still present, its effects can be negligible for small-scale experiments conducted in orbit. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding terms like "weightlessness" and "apparent weight" in the context of relativity and gravitational effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microgravity and its implications in space travel.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of weightlessness and apparent weight.
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational effects and tidal forces.
  • Awareness of relativity and its impact on the perception of gravity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of microgravity and its applications in scientific experiments.
  • Study the differences between actual weight and apparent weight in physics.
  • Explore tidal forces and their effects on spacecraft in orbit.
  • Learn about the implications of relativity on gravitational perception and measurements.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the scientific principles of space travel and gravity.

neh4pres
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
how come when NASA speaks of the either the space shuttle or the ISS, they speak as if they have left the effects of Earth's gravity? This is not true. The people in the ISS are falling toward Earth at the same speed as the craft around them. When they start their decent back to Earth they feel weightless until they touch atmosphere. At that point the atmosphere slows the craft and the people inside feel the G's from that. Are some of the smartest people that nieve to think that we can acually leave the effects of Earth's gravity, becouse i don't think that is possable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
neh4pres said:
Are some of the smartest people that nieve to think that we can acually leave the effects of Earth's gravity, becouse i don't think that is possable.
What effects are you talking about? Remember that locally it is impossible to establish if you are in a gravitational field. Note that a spacecraft is relatively small.
 
the planets pull on our sun. the Earth pulls on the moon and keeps it in an orbit. the collective of our galaxy pulls on other galaxy's. I don't think it is possable to leave the effects of the Earth's gravity. So how come NASA fumbles these words.
 
neh4pres said:
the planets pull on our sun. the Earth pulls on the moon and keeps it in an orbit. the collective of our galaxy pulls on other galaxy's. I don't think it is possable to leave the effects of the Earth's gravity. So how come NASA fumbles these words.

I think all NASA are saying is that the effect of gravity on small scale experiments conducted inside the space shuttle is almost zero. This allows them to carry our certain "zero gravity" experiments in the shuttle that would be difficult or impossible within the Earth's atmosphere. Of course it does not mean that gravity does not have an effect on the shuttle.
 
neh4pres said:
the planets pull on our sun. the Earth pulls on the moon and keeps it in an orbit. the collective of our galaxy pulls on other galaxy's. I don't think it is possable to leave the effects of the Earth's gravity. So how come NASA fumbles these words.
I think there is something you misunderstand about the effects of gravity. One of the effects of gravity we can measure are the so-called tidal effects For a small localized area you can effectively ignore those effects and a spaceship is very small in this respect.

Of course the curvature of spacetime does influence how objects move with respect to each other and sometimes they bump into each other but that does not influence any laws of physics as the bodies all move inertially. Inside the spaceship there are, except for the extremely small tidal effects, and things like precessions, no effects whatsoever due to gravity.
 
neh4pres, you are thinking too little. Of course NASA knows that Earth's gravity doesn't end at the Earth's surface.

MeJennifer, you are thinking too much. NASA doesn't expect the average citizen of the US to have the foggiest idea about tidal gravity effects.NASA use of words like weightlessness and microgravity is (a) often aimed at the average US citizen, and (b) correct. "Weight" comes in two flavors. "Actual weight" is tautologically defined as mass times the acceleration due to gravity. The "actual weight" of an astronaut floating around in the near-weightlessness of the ISS is close to the astronaut's actual weight on the surface of the Earth. Nothing, including a bathroom scale, can measure "actual weight" directly because nothing can sense gravity directly.

A bathroom scale measures "apparent weight". The "apparent weight" of some object is the net sum of all real forces except for gravity acting on the object. (Note that from a relativistic perspective, apparent weight is the net sum of all real forces acting on an object, period, as gravitation isn't a real force in relativity; it's a pseudoforce instead.) An astronaut in the ISS is not quite in free fall because the astronaut is not at the ISS center of gravity and the ISS is subject to atmospheric drag. The astronaut will fall very slowly toward some surface of the ISS. The acceleration is very, very tiny. Earthbound viewers see the astronauts floating around as if they were weightless. As nothing, including the astronauts themselves, can sense actual weight, the astronauts feels themselves floating around apparently weightless.
 


D H said:
A bathroom scale measures "apparent weight". The "apparent weight" of some object is the net sum of all real forces except for gravity acting on the object. (Note that from a relativistic perspective, apparent weight is the net sum of all real forces acting on an object, period, as gravitation isn't a real force in relativity; it's a pseudoforce instead.) An astronaut in the ISS is not quite in free fall because the astronaut is not at the ISS center of gravity and the ISS is subject to atmospheric drag. The astronaut will fall very slowly toward some surface of the ISS. The acceleration is very, very tiny. Earthbound viewers see the astronauts floating around as if they were weightless. As nothing, including the astronauts themselves, can sense actual weight, the astronauts feels themselves floating around apparently weightless.

thanks... this is very insightful... you think deeply,as do I.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K