Recent content by neilparker62

  1. neilparker62

    Interval Kinematics

    @robphy Thanks for your kind comment and desmos graph. As mentioned above, I'm working on developing kinematics lessons along the lines you suggest. In addition to the trapezoid area, I also split the area into two triangles leading to the equation s=(u+v)/2 x (u-v)/a. I also have done some...
  2. neilparker62

    Interval Kinematics

    Not at all. Will try to implement with emphasis on vector rather than scalar quantities. Thanks very much for the feedback. The 'presentation' hasn't been used yet. Am busy developing a set of lessons on kinematics. I thought I would pick that topic that as a 'testing ground' for rapid...
  3. neilparker62

    Interval Kinematics

    Thanks very much for your detailed comment - no apologies needed. Yes - for this particular lesson on interval kinematics we should indeed be using ##\Delta t## and probably ##\Delta v## and ##\Delta s## as well. I think the use of this equation is indeed conceptual since one can visualize...
  4. neilparker62

    Interval Kinematics

    For interest - comments welcome.
  5. neilparker62

    Artemis 2 launch - humans return to the Moon after 54 years

    Some snapshots taken from the live stream. Times as recorded on my cellphone. GMT+2 23:49 01:54 02:07 02:09
  6. neilparker62

    Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

    May I respectfully submit that the article did not have any intention to compare human solutions with AI solutions nor indeed to compare solutions generally. AI came up with a couple of interesting additions to an already interesting thread and those were presented in the article alongside the...
  7. neilparker62

    Solve the quadratic equation involving sum and product

    The roots of the equation in part (i) are the same as the roots in part (ii). Since in both cases we have equations of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 with a=1 , 'c' = -c we must also have -p=(1+c)/c.
  8. neilparker62

    Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

    Thanks for the comment(s). Re functions: Yes - the AI engine wanted to go that way but I got a little confused by all the "defs" it came up with and couldn't keep track. As I mention in the article it's so easy for AI to make subtle programming errors which you won't notice unless you know...
  9. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    "All in one" derivation of compound angle formulae - based on the video construction.
  10. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    Neat geometric derivation of ##\tan(A+B)=\frac{\tan A + \tan B}{1-\tan A \tan B}## if we divide all terms in ##\frac{ay+bx}{by-ax}## by ##by##.
  11. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    $$\tan x=\frac{1}{5} \implies \tan2x=\frac{5}{12} \implies \tan4x=\frac{120}{119}$$ $$\tan \left( \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{1}{239} \right)+\frac{\pi}{4}\right)=\frac{1+\frac{1}{239}}{1-\frac{1}{239}}=\frac{120}{119}$$
  12. neilparker62

    It will highlight your solution as well as illustrate a treasure trove of underlying geometry...

    It will highlight your solution as well as illustrate a treasure trove of underlying geometry 'dug up' by AI. I will include an introductory paragraph saying I'm writing it as a reference example for the many contributions you have made on PF.
  13. neilparker62

    Ok - so what I was thinking of doing is writing a short article on one of your many interesting...

    Ok - so what I was thinking of doing is writing a short article on one of your many interesting posts and subsequent threads. https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...riangle-given-some-extra-information.1063874/
  14. neilparker62

    Hi again. I don't think there is anything like an "official" pf letterhead since it's just a...

    Hi again. I don't think there is anything like an "official" pf letterhead since it's just a website. But you can check with @Greg Bernhardt on that one.