Recent content by neilparker62

  1. neilparker62

    Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

    May I respectfully submit that the article did not have any intention to compare human solutions with AI solutions nor indeed to compare solutions generally. AI came up with a couple of interesting additions to an already interesting thread and those were presented in the article alongside the...
  2. neilparker62

    Solve the quadratic equation involving sum and product

    The roots of the equation in part (i) are the same as the roots in part (ii). Since in both cases we have equations of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0 with a=1 , 'c' = -c we must also have -p=(1+c)/c.
  3. neilparker62

    Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

    Thanks for the comment(s). Re functions: Yes - the AI engine wanted to go that way but I got a little confused by all the "defs" it came up with and couldn't keep track. As I mention in the article it's so easy for AI to make subtle programming errors which you won't notice unless you know...
  4. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    "All in one" derivation of compound angle formulae - based on the video construction.
  5. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    Neat geometric derivation of ##\tan(A+B)=\frac{\tan A + \tan B}{1-\tan A \tan B}## if we divide all terms in ##\frac{ay+bx}{by-ax}## by ##by##.
  6. neilparker62

    Prove that ## 4\tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{5}\right]- \tan^{-1}\left[\dfrac{1}{239}\right]= \dfrac{π}{4}##

    $$\tan x=\frac{1}{5} \implies \tan2x=\frac{5}{12} \implies \tan4x=\frac{120}{119}$$ $$\tan \left( \tan^{-1} \left( \frac{1}{239} \right)+\frac{\pi}{4}\right)=\frac{1+\frac{1}{239}}{1-\frac{1}{239}}=\frac{120}{119}$$
  7. neilparker62

    It will highlight your solution as well as illustrate a treasure trove of underlying geometry...

    It will highlight your solution as well as illustrate a treasure trove of underlying geometry 'dug up' by AI. I will include an introductory paragraph saying I'm writing it as a reference example for the many contributions you have made on PF.
  8. neilparker62

    Ok - so what I was thinking of doing is writing a short article on one of your many interesting...

    Ok - so what I was thinking of doing is writing a short article on one of your many interesting posts and subsequent threads. https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...riangle-given-some-extra-information.1063874/
  9. neilparker62

    Hi again. I don't think there is anything like an "official" pf letterhead since it's just a...

    Hi again. I don't think there is anything like an "official" pf letterhead since it's just a website. But you can check with @Greg Bernhardt on that one.
  10. neilparker62

    Hi. Did you get your reference from someone on PF ? I can write something like I see you...

    Hi. Did you get your reference from someone on PF ? I can write something like I see you regularly posting interesting Maths/geometry problems and contributing to discussions around those.
  11. neilparker62

    Hi everyone

    I'm sure they don't and wouldn't worry much if they did! I wish I was more clued up on those particular topic areas but in all honesty I'm not.
  12. neilparker62

    Hi everyone

    Welcome to the PF community - I'm sure you'll find some expert advice on those topic areas (not that I personally know much about them!)
  13. neilparker62

    Paul Hinds has passed

    Deepest condolences - Robert to you and all the family. It's been an honour to share this forum with stalwarts such as your Dad. We'll hugely miss his always sage and thoughtful posts.
  14. neilparker62

    Praise 2024 Member Award Ceremony

    Seconded. And if I may put it this way - it's reward enough to be part of the PF community and (occasionally) to post something that others find useful/interesting . Or to start a thread which usually yields any number of useful responses.