Recent content by patric44

To get a general overview of some resources it might give. when it suggests something that isn't entirely logical, you ask real humans who has experience. just simple as that.

I am just trying to find the right thing to do, GhatGpt is not reliable for its word to be taken as an advise. that's why I asked. Why are you bothered?!

it is a genius plan, requires an IQ of 300+ :smile:

can't think of any to be honest. The thing is, I asked ChatGpt and it mentioned that some journal had a policy for the period of time between two successive submissions. I don't know if it is making this up, but it got me worried!. So there is no problem I suppose, right?

Hello everyone, I had a paper just got accepted for publication few days ago in a specific journal, and I feel comfortable in their publication system and the review process. Is it normal to submit another paper to the same journal (its on a different topic) just after the acceptance of the...

why almost all your replies on my posts seems very harsh, you don't know my circumstances or why I need to publish the paper, I am writing this paper for my masters which is mandatory, and almost all my supervisors of no help to me, I almost came up with the idea my self, read some books and...

Ironically these modifications actually address all the concerns that reviewer B had, but removed the orientation that reviewer A saw some potential in it, (I also added the all modification he wanted). its like by making all the corrections to make the paper scientifically correct I am loosing...

Hello everyone I recently submitted a paper to a journal, and got a major revision decision, the two reviewers has some contradicting opinions, one sees a merit in the paper with some changes, and the other hates it with harsh comments that question the conclusion of the paper. After seeing the...

Please don't through accusations who said the two papers are substantially similar! you never saw them, plus I never send it. Now to my main question, can the reviewer decline the invitation after accepting it, is that common in the literature

Hello every one I submitted a paper to the journal "Physica Scripta" 25 days ago, the status was "out for review" then changed to "1st reviewer agreed to report" and after 15 days instead of "1st reviewer reports received", it changed to "out for review" again?!, can any one explain what could...

i didn't cite the 1st paper because I don't know if it will be published or not in the first journal it still in the review process. So what if I changed the Hamiltonian of the second paper to another parametrization, this will change most of the analysis. my main question is how to modify the...

Hello every one, I recently submitted a paper using a specific Hamiltonian to analyze the nuclear structure of a certain element to a journal. Then I found that another journal has a special issue about my topic. I modified the original paper by using another chemical element which changed all...

OK, so you mean the pressure due to the weight of water contained at the z part (##\rho g h_{z}##) will act also along the right side affecting the area ##A_{y}## hence its force = ##\rho g h_{z} A_{y}##, am I correct in this interpretation. the confusing thing also is, if I use integration it...

I guess it will be ##\rho g h_{y}## but it will be a downward pressure.

Hi All, in the following problem: the book solution I don't understand why he added the term $$ \rho g h_{z} A_{y} $$ shouldn't it just be : $$ F = 1/2 \rho g h_{y} A_{y} $$