Recent content by pdxautodidact
-
P
Undergrad Is Dark Matter Challenging Our Understanding of the Universe?
Generally dark matter is described as a halo, which would be a sphere around the galaxy.. If the majority of the dark matter around the Milky Way is present at its boundary, then its much, much farther than the distance to the sun (LY vs. AU). The standard cosmological model is lambda CDM...- pdxautodidact
- Post #5
- Forum: Astronomy and Astrophysics
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
I don't think I am explaining myself clearly, but I am good now. Thanks!- pdxautodidact
- Post #11
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
I think I see what you mean. I was worried because I remember a professor teaching that a system with negative energy indicates a bound system. Also, because conservative forces must satisfy ##-\vec{\nabla}V=\vec{F}##, I thought the sign surely must not be arbitrary (although one can naturally...- pdxautodidact
- Post #9
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
But for a bound system energy should be negative, like the electron in the hydrogen atom. You do the same thing, but with Coulomb Force. The potential for that force is negative, so it is more than the kinetic energy term and you're left with negative energy which is ##-\frac{R}{n^2}##, where...- pdxautodidact
- Post #7
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
Still getting a positive energy, if anyone sees any flaws in my methodology please post! Thanks & cheers.- pdxautodidact
- Post #5
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
My mistake was using a minus sign in my force; the centripetal force should have had a minus sign too. I used $\hat{r}$ for my force, but not with the centripetal force, which would also be negative. I should have just used the magnitude. The exponent k isn't specified as odd or even, so we...- pdxautodidact
- Post #3
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Using Bohr quantization rules to calculate energy levels
Homework Statement Use the Bohr quantization rules to calculate the energy levels for a particle moving in a potential \begin{equation} V\left(r\right)= V_0 \left(\frac{r}{a}\right)^k \end{equation} where k is positive and very large. Sketch the form of the potential (done) and show that the...- pdxautodidact
- Thread
- Bohr Energy Energy levels Levels Quantization Rules
- Replies: 10
- Forum: Advanced Physics Homework Help
-
P
Graduate Induced Metric of a 2-Sphere: Why i≠j?
Yeah, I combined the trig terms into a 0 instead of a 1, so that's it. I see why it works for all cases now, in hindsight it's obvious. Thanks!- pdxautodidact
- Post #7
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
P
Graduate Induced Metric of a 2-Sphere: Why i≠j?
Okay, so I went through it again: let X be the 2 sphere with your suggested parameterization $$ X_{;\theta} = \left( \begin{array}{c} x^1 = rcos\theta cos \left(\phi + \theta \right) - rsin \theta sin \left(\phi + \theta \right) \\ x^2 = rcos \theta sin \left( \phi + \theta \right) +...- pdxautodidact
- Post #5
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
P
Graduate Induced Metric of a 2-Sphere: Why i≠j?
Does that, in fact, parameterize a sphere? It's not obvious to me. I included an r term in the coordinates since I want it in general, not the only the unit case. The induced metric was: $$ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & r^2 sin^2\theta & r^2 sin^2\theta \\ 0 & r^2...- pdxautodidact
- Post #3
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
P
Graduate Induced Metric of a 2-Sphere: Why i≠j?
So, by accident, while deriving the induced metric for a sphere in 3 dimensions I realized that the transpose of the jacobi matrix multiplied by the jacobi matrix (considering it as 3 row/column vectors)will work out the induced metric. Why is it that i≠j ends up being superfluous. One would...- pdxautodidact
- Thread
- Induced Metric
- Replies: 6
- Forum: Differential Geometry
-
P
Graduate SU(3) and dark U(1) coupling to dark matter
hi both & thanks, i don't meen a new gauge groupn (except the dark U(1)), merely to look at strongly interacting particles in addition to weakly interacting particles. I'm not in graduate school or academia, and it's been a few years since I've been reading papers, so I'm a little out of the...- pdxautodidact
- Post #6
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
P
Graduate SU(3) and dark U(1) coupling to dark matter
Well, coupling a dark radiation component has been done: "http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5126. Can one make an SU(3) coupling to dark matter, intead of the standard SU(2) isospin route. The arguments I hear for WIMPS are that they interact only via the weak nuclear force, thus they happen...- pdxautodidact
- Post #3
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
P
Graduate SU(3) and dark U(1) coupling to dark matter
Is anyone familiar with a $$ SU\left( 3 \right) \otimes U \left( 1 \right){}_d$$ or $$SU \left( 3 \right) \otimes SU\left( 2 \right) \otimes U \left( 1 \right)_d $$ model? Kind of what I'm currently interesting in working with, but I don't have access to anything other than the arxiv.cheers.- pdxautodidact
- Thread
- Coupling Dark matter Matter Su(3)
- Replies: 5
- Forum: Beyond the Standard Models
-
P
Graduate Solving for a Lie Algebra in General
So, I just went through the derivation of the Lie algebra for SO(n). in order to do so, we considered ##b^{-1}ab##, and related it to ##U\left(b^{-1}ab\right)##, and since we have a group homomorphism, ##U^{-1}\left(b\right)U\left(a\right)U\left(b\right)##, all of which correspond to the...- pdxautodidact
- Thread
- Algebra General Lie algebra
- Replies: 1
- Forum: Linear and Abstract Algebra