PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.Now we have reached the nub of the matter. Unless we use your preferred terminolgy and look at physics your preferred way, and share... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.And who are we to argue with the late Arnold B Arons? -
PeroK reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Skeptical.
The only bending over backwards is when uttering the phrase "action-reaction" instead of "Third-Law pair of forces". The former is a... -
PeroK replied to the thread I The rocket equation, one more time.As an example, imagine we have a financial spreadsheet. Let's say column A is the starting balance, column B is a deposit and column C... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Conservation of angular momentum in the iceskater example.The simplest example is an object moving in uniform circular motion. The force and acceleration are entirely centripetal. That is to... -
PeroK reacted to anuttarasammyak's post in the thread I Conservation of angular momentum in the iceskater example with
Like.
I would like to expalin it in the case of ellipse orbit of planets as shown in the figure below. You see that F has components that is... -
PeroK replied to the thread I The rocket equation, one more time.They can do what they like. As long as it adds up. -
PeroK replied to the thread I The rocket equation, one more time.##\Delta m## is generally defined as the change in ##m##. If the mass reduces, then ##\Delta m## is negative. It's a common point of... -
PeroK replied to the thread Independent Researcher.This site focuses on mainstream science. We can't discuss personal theories. -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is using r as a coordinate in Birkhoff's theorem a limitation?.First, we need a definition of what it means for a manifold to be spherically symmetric. There is a formal definition here, in terms of... -
PeroK reacted to wrobel's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
I have always been wondering how such a banal thing can generate endless discussions. -
PeroK reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Sad.
How does dropping the arbitrary and irrelevant cause & effect assignment make applying Newton's 3rd Law more difficult? If anything, it... -
PeroK replied to the thread Cosmologist looking to have meaningful conversation.Perhaps you'll find what you are looking for here. This site focuses on established cosmology, and personal theories are not up for...