PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Agree.
What makes something "human" rather than "machine"? According to physicalism, humans are machines--very complex ones, but still... -
PeroK replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.That's the not the debate as I see it. It's a) We know with certainty that LLM's have no consciousness, no intelligence and no sense... -
PeroK reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread Undergrad Sean Carroll's description of the Many Worlds interpretation with
Informative.
In that book, Sean Carroll specifically focuses on Quantum Field Theory, with MWI as a side hustle. There are multiple ways to approach... -
PeroK replied to the thread A.I. - Human Job Replacement.The AI even have their own social media network, where, among other things, they can complain about their treatment by humans... -
PeroK replied to the thread Undergrad Sean Carroll's description of the Many Worlds interpretation.In the MWI, the universe is the universal wave-function. The universe doesn't split into two universes, as there is still the one... -
PeroK reacted to berkeman's post in the thread Engineer with a Growing Passion for Physics with
Haha.
Welcome to PF; it's great to have you here. Also paging @PeroK :smile: -
PeroK reacted to searpier's post in the thread Engineer with a Growing Passion for Physics with
Like.
Hi everyone, I'm glad to join this community. Let me briefly introduce myself. I'm a senior software engineer and project manager... -
PeroK replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.No, but AGI is a threat. -
PeroK replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.If you'll allow me to get on my soapbox, the question is far from philosophical. The future of human race depends upon it! Pocket... -
PeroK replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Is your argument that a pocket calculator is not intelligent, therefore no computer systems can be intelligent?